Please refer to Unicode 15 and associated UAX documents
consistently in the Bibliography section and impacted sections
This comment is related to FR
5.3p5.2 [lex.charset] Codepoint names in identifiers.
Some of the Unicode versions referenced in the comment come from the Unicode version that corresponds to an ISO/IEC 10646 reference.
As Corentin described in a message to
the SG16 mailing list, there are ramifications to referring
to ISO/IEC 10646 to satisfy some Unicode needs and to the Unicode
Standard for others. The different release cadence for ISO/IEC
10646 implies that we either have to 1) live with references to
multiple Unicode versions, 2) restrict references to Unicode
versions associated with the current ISO/IEC 10646 standard, or 3)
discontinue referencing ISO/IEC 10646 (and make the case to the
ISO that the limited scope of ISO/IEC 10646 makes it not suitable
for our purposes).