Please review the following. If you agree with the proposed change
and have no further information to add, then there is no need to
respond. If you disagree with the proposed change, have corrections
or new information to offer, or have comments on the candidate
polls, then please reply by Monday, October 31st.
FR Annex E [uaxid]
Shorten contents and integrate with [lex.name]
The usefulness of that clause is debatable.
Please state in [lex.name] the set of rules/profiles followed by
c++ identifiers, rather than listing all of the rules that do not
Only state "C++ conforms to UAX31 by meeting the requirements R1
“Default Identifiers” and R4 “Equivalent Normalized Identifiers”
and remove [uaxid]
SG16 chair notes:
As discussed in the 2022-10-19
SG16 telecon, this comment has interaction with US-64.
- [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends accepting the comment in the
direction of the proposed change.
- [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment on the basis
that explicit indication of Unicode requirement conformance,
non-conformance, or inapplicability is useful.