On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 6:31 PM Peter Bindels <peterbindels@gmail.com> wrote:
1. Add uint8_t, uint16_t and uint32_t to the table. May not exist, but it is ridiculous if those do not work.

Thanks, I updated the paper to explain that
charN_t is always defined to have a uint_leastN_t underlying representation, on all platforms, so that's what the wording uses.
On platforms where they are defined (thankfully, the vast majority of them) uintN_t are aliases of uint_leastN_t
So if they exist, they work.

 
2. Rephrase nuking. Try not to use war terms for programming language design.

Rest lgtm.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022, 13:44 Corentin via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Actually, I think this is certainly good enough for a first presentation.
Tom, could you schedule it whenever SG16 has time?

Thanks,

Corentin

On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 8:16 PM Corentin <corentin.jabot@gmail.com> wrote:
Early draft, feedback welcome.

Thanks, 
Corentin 

https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2626R0.pdf 
--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16