Hello folks.

Here is a new draft of P1885 https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1885R9.pdf 

P1885 was forwarded to LEWG last month, however two papers proposes changes:

P2498R0 Forward compatibility of text_encodingwith additional encoding registries
P2491R0 Text encodings follow-up

There were also a number of negative comments during the electronic polling period.

To address all of that:
The paper goes into more details, as well as why I think the other changes proposed by P2498R0 (adding padding to text_encoding just in case) and P2491R0 (adding different names for the wide encodings) are problematic.
P2498R0 further suggests a change of naming for text_encoding::id/text_encoding_mib(). LEWG already discussed these names, but I'm not opposed to changing them if that increases consensus.

I hope these changes will increase consensus.

Thanks for your feedbacks, 

Corentin