Hello,
Here is a revision of P1885 that expands the revision and modify the wording to reflect the
The strategy I have chosen is to first describe the encoding of each static function as being an implementation-defined encoding scheme, and then substitute that by UTF-16 if needed.
the literal functions are specified to return the encoding of the object representation, as discussed.
In addition, these papers will be in the mailing list:
Relax requirements on wchar_t to match existing practices
Unevaluated Strings
Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning
Whitespaces Wording Revamp
I am exhausted, so the likelihood these are full of typos is non-negligible.
I am not sure I will have time to address further feedback or concerns this week, but please send them my way anyway, things will get fixed, eventually.
Have a great week,
Corentin