<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:24 PM Tom Honermann &lt;<a href="mailto:tom@honermann.net">tom@honermann.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
    <div>On 9/22/21 2:03 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre>On 22/09/2021 03.41, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre>In view of the acceptance of p2290 delimited escape sequences, I think allowing named universal escapes everywhere UCNs are now might make more sense than restricting them to just in literals? 
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre>Agreed.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Likewise. I think we should just make them an alternate spelling
      of <i>universal-character-name</i>.<br></p></div></blockquote><div>It would certainly be the simpler option.</div><div>FYI in clang this is twice the work because there are two code paths, but it&#39;s not a huge amount of work either.</div><div>I would not expect that capability to be used by anyone though.</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><p>
    </p>
    <p>Tom.</p>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </div>

</blockquote></div></div>

