I've attached a marked up rich difference between the two versions on github. It does look like it's a sensible state, although yes, wording will need updates.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:38 PM Tom Honermann <tom@honermann.net> wrote:
I attached a draft R1 with changes I had previously worked on. I briefly looked at it and I don't think I left it in a half-baked state, but it would be worth diffing it against the P0 revision with a reasonable HTML diffing tool to make sure. The "Changes since P2071R0" section suggest I addressed the issues raised in Prague.
The todo list I have includes:Richard Smith had requested that \N{...} be allowed in identifiers for consistency with \u and \U. We should, of course, just acknowledge that Richard is always right and do that :)
- Add discussion regarding the use of \N{...} in identifiers.
- Add a proposal option to allow use of \N{...} in identifiers.
- Rebase wording on the current WD; particularly due to the adoption of P2029.
- Implement the proposal.
Wording changes may additionally be needed for P2314. Maybe for one or more of Corentin's recent papers as well.
Tom.
On 9/15/21 3:21 PM, Steve Downey wrote:
https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/798#issuecomment-585750666 has notes from JF
EWG Prague Thursday afternoon:
We’re interested in supporting named universal character escapes.
SF F N A SA 14 5 0 0 0 This should further support aliases.
SF F N A SA 18 2 1 0 0 It should further be case insensitive.
SF F N A SA 0 6 6 9 2 It should further support UAX44-LM2 with arbitrary spaces and dashes.
SF F N A SA 1 4 5 8 5 The paper is not tentatively ready yet. We want to see the updated paper before marking it as tentatively ready.
I missed Prague, but this might be enough, if you don't have any more detailed notes. I can check the wiki as well.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Tom Honermann <tom@honermann.net> wrote:
On 9/15/21 2:31 PM, Steve Downey wrote:
> If I am reading the github correctly, EWG would like to see some
> revision before picking it up again. Is there something I can
> help with? This looks like it's really close and desired and quite
> possible for 23?
Yes. I recall there not being much to do, but I need to find my list of
what that is. I would very much appreciate the help. I'll hunt down that
list and try to get it to you later today or tomorrow.
Tom.