Hi Tom,
Regarding the statement:Hubert noted that there will be a competing paper partially motivated by a desire for the standard to remain abstract and not tied too heavily to Unicode.
I would like to clarify that I was, in part, elaborating on something that (I believe) either you or Jens said earlier on the call:
Hubert noted that the competing paper mentioned earlier[*] is partially motivated by a desire for the standard to remain abstract and not tied too heavily to Unicode.
[*] This is a paper that would change C++ to use the same UCN/extended character model as C.
Thanks,
Hubert Tong
//
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:45 PM Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
--The summary for the SG16 meeting held September 23rd, 2020 is now available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
No decisions were made at this meeting.
The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 14th, from 19:30-21:00 UTC (timezone conversion). The draft agenda is:
For the Boost.Text discussion, please read the following email threads:
- Boost.Text
- Review changes made following the initial Boost review.
- P2194R0: The character set of C++ source code is Unicode
- Continue discussion.
For the review of P2194R0, please (re-)read section 5.2.1 (Character Sets) of the C99 rationale document, especially the "UCN models" section.
No decisions will be made at this meeting, but direction polls are expected.For any new attendees: The meetings are video conferences conducted via Zoom. If you are planning to attend, please test your system by visiting https://zoom.us/test before the scheduled meeting time.
Tom.
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16