Hi Tom,


Having reviewed the paper, I’m struggling to understand how most of those concerns are pertinent to discussing P2178R1 proposal 1.


I’m not adverse to talking about them, because they are important and need to be addressed at some point, but it feels like giving them the attention that they deserve would not leave time for discussing P2194R0.


Please could we consider scheduling a discussion of these points for another meeting when your draft paper is ready to discuss in detail?


Many thanks,




From: SG16 <sg16-bounces@lists.isocpp.org> On Behalf Of Tom Honermann via SG16
Sent: 08 September 2020 16:19
To: SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org>
Cc: Tom Honermann <tom@honermann.net>
Subject: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2020-09-09



This is your friendly reminder that an SG16 telecon will be held tomorrow, Wednesday September 9th, at 19:30 UTC (timezone conversion).

This meeting will be conducted via Zoom.  To attend, visit https://iso.zoom.us/j/8414530059 at the start of the meeting.  Please contact me privately if necessary for the meeting password.

The agenda is:

For the UTF-8 discussion, please take some time ahead of the meeting to consider the following concerns:

A very rough draft of a paper discussing these concerns is available at https://rawgit.com/tahonermann/sg16/master/papers/dyyyyr0-utf-8-source-files.html.  We will *not* discuss this paper at this meeting, but the Existing Practice section may be informative (please ignore the rest of the draft for now).

No decisions will be made at this meeting, but direction polls are expected.