No, in that case I would have to use your reification API
(Not yet standard) to express what my_spellable_name
maps to, as you want to restrict our ability to make custom
character mappings - unless I missed something again?

AlisdairM

On May 28, 2020, at 17:00, Corentin Jabot via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:



On Thu, May 28, 2020, 17:51 Hubert Tong via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:32 AM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
A more interesting question is whether we expect tools
to provide a translation layer using \uXXXX in identifiers
to alias more reasonable names in a user’s native
encoding?
+1
 

In that case you could replace by some_prefix_XXXX.

Thinking of running a script to provide a translation of
a header with more usable names for my working
environment.

AlisdairM

> On May 28, 2020, at 16:08, Corentin via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
>
>
> Do we really expect people to ever type \uxxxx in C++20.
> They wouldn't be more or less first class citizen as they are today given we would not changing the requirements on characters must be supported by the physical character set

--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16