On 1/9/20 5:35 PM, Tom Honermann via Core wrote:
On 1/8/20 3:17 PM, Steve Downey wrote:
I don't believe that "execution character set" is quite the right term, however I also believe that there isn't quite the right term in the standard to describe the encoding used at compile time for the values of members of the execution character set.

I agree it isn't the right term and I have also been under the impression that the right term doesn't yet exist in the standard.

I spent a little time searching and came across http://eel.is/c++draft/lex#ccon-9.sentence-1:

"A universal-character-name is translated to the encoding, in the appropriate execution character set, of the character named."

This suggests that "the encoding of the execution character set" might be better (for now).  If you agree, I'll make that change.

I tried out that change and decided it is an improvement.  Updated draft attached.  Other suggestions appreciated!

Tom.