Good catch on the questions. I'll fix consistently one way or the other. Probably adding '?'

I thought you were done with Boost.Text, but didn't want to over promise your work. 

Allocators. Well I work for Bloomberg, and can tell you without a doubt that Lakos will No vote if it doesn't support them. I consider it facing reality. I also use the pre-standard equivalent of pmr frequently, and find it useful. 
Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing scoped allocators vanish, but someone must want them. 

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 23:36 Zach Laine <whatwasthataddress@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:28 PM Steve Downey <sdowney@gmail.com> wrote:

Study Group 16 std::text Technical Direction


Thanks so much for doing this, Steve.   Two nits: 1) The issues in Areas of Discussion are stated as questions, but they currently lack question marks. 2) Boost.Text is actually code complete now, but of course will probably change during a Boost review.

One crazy guy shouting into the wilderness point:  I'm probably alone, but I don't think we need, nor do we want, allocators.  (Discuss!)  I understand if I'm alone in this view.

Zach