Thanks for the feedback, everybody, I appreciate the contribution to the
discussion around my paper.

There's a lot to respond to in this thread by now; to make sure that my
response isn't overly long for an email, and that it's discoverable outside
the reflector, I plan to explain my thinking through the paper system, via
a new revision of P4030, and/or a new rebuttal paper to P4279. I'll update
this reflector thread with links once I've had time to collect and write up
my thoughts properly.

Thanks,

Eddie

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 8:52 AM Jan Schultke via SG9 <sg9_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> It sounds quite non-academic to me to apply an encoding-correcting
>> view on a memory-mapped range and therefore apply the endian
>> correction
>> only to the parts of the range I actually end up traversing.
>>
>
> I was under the impression that people typically use memory mapping to map
> e.g. a file onto a buffer of bytes, in which case being able to traverse a
> byte array with reversed endianness would provide more utility than just
> the quasi-transform-view that wraps byteswap.
> --
> SG9 mailing list
> SG9_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg9
>