Cross-posting this message to both the SG9 and SG16 mailing lists.

I've uploaded a new draft D2728R14 of my transcoding views paper, which
includes a new discussion of the idea of adding a member function to the
transcoding iterator to provide the underlying code unit range for the
current code point, and my case against doing so, in the "Design Discussion
and Alternatives" section.

It can be found here:

https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2728R14.html#base_code_units

This should address the requests for relevant code examples from the most
recent SG16 telecon (2026-05-27
<https://wiki.isocpp.org/2026_Telecons:SG16Teleconference2026-05-27>). See
also previous discussions on the SG16 reflector
<https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2026/05/4711.php> and mattermost
<https://chat.isocpp.org/general/pl/6hms7iacbtbmppcyubezerc95a>.

Thanks,

Eddie