Following the review of https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P3657R1.pdf on Wednesday and discussion
on the use of unicode code points vs glyphs, I just ran across an open Editorial issue that might be
relevant to wording my paper:
   https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/5502

It asks to specify text that does not use even the glyphs using unicode code points.

Do we have any more feedback before CWG review the paper?
I plan to submit R2 including the telecom review for Core in time for the Kona meeting, and have
time to incorporate this change as I am already moving the affected words, and it would be
good to consolidate all changes into one place.

AlisdairM