Thanks Tom.

I will admit to mild confusion on the rationale for keeping the code conversion facets,
unless we also want to withdraw support for adopting https://wg21.link/P2783 for C++26
as well?

Could I request guidance on what a replacement facility would look like, given the
current facility is built to support a framework based on runtime locales?

I understand that we do not want to remove something without a replacement, but
we will need a whole new text framework where character encoding is independent
of locale that do not have today. Mixing Unicode with runtime locales is a recipe for
text corruption, with no viable error handling in our current framework.

AlisdairM

> On Apr 23, 2025, at 11:22 PM, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Thank you to everyone that attended today.
>
> WG21 members can find the draft meeting summary with poll results at https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-04-23.
>
> Tom.
>