On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, at 9:45 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday 21 July 2024 11:39:54 GMT-7 Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> > Is there such an 1:1 mapping?
>>
>> I believe not: Windows code pages 950 (Traditional Chinese) and 949 (Korean)
>> don't appear to have IANA registrations. They differ from Big5 and EUC-KR
>> in a way analogous to how windows-1252 differs from ISO-8859-1, how
>> windows-31j differs from Shift_JIS, and how GBK differs from GB2312.
>
> How about some other identifier roster that has such 1:1 mapping? We don't have
> to use the IANA registrations, we can specify one that works.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/intl/code-page-identifiers is the most mainstream numbering scheme that covers execution encodings. It has quite a few EBCDIC entries, but I’m not sure how well it covers the ones that z/OS actually uses.

-- 
Henri Sivonen