C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: Agenda for the 2024-04-10 SG16 meeting

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:05:04 -0400
Ok, thanks for letting me know. I hope all goes well!

Tom.

On 4/10/24 7:23 AM, Steve Downey wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm going to miss this one. I've got to meet with a tax
> accountant about my Dad's estate.
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 17:46 Tom Honermann via SG16
> <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> This is your friendly reminder that this meeting is taking place
> tomorrow.
>
> Tom.
>
> On 4/8/24 4:15 PM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
>>
>> SG16 will hold a meeting on Wednesday, April 10th, at 19:30 UTC
>> (timezone conversion
>> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20240410T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pdt&p3=tz_mdt&p4=tz_cdt&p5=tz_edt&p6=tz_cest>).
>>
>> *For those in Europe, please note that daylight savings time has
>> begun, so this telecon will begin one hour later relative to the
>> last SG16 telecon.*
>>
>> The agenda follows.
>>
>> * P2758R2: Emitting messages at compile time
>> <https://wg21.link/p2758r2>.
>>
>> Though prior revisions of P2758 had an honorable mention in a
>> couple of SG16 meetings last year, this will be our first formal
>> review of it. The initial version of this paper was introduced at
>> the same time as P2741 (user-generated static_assert messages)
>> <https://wg21.link/p2741> with significant overlap in
>> functionality. P2741R3 <https://wg21.link/p2741r3> was adopted
>> for C++26 during the Varna WG21 meeting in 2023 and P2758R2 has
>> been updated to remove the overlap (at least from what is
>> proposed, sections 2.1 and 4 don't appear to have been updated).
>> This paper proposes a set of library functions that enable a
>> custom diagnostic message to be produced as an informative,
>> warning, or error message with corresponding effect on
>> translation success. Please review the prior discussion of
>> P2741R1 (user-generated static_assert messages)
>> <https://wg21.link/p2741r1> during the 2024-04-26 SG16 meeting
>> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/blob/master/README-2023.md#april-26th-2023>
>> for context. EWG has already reviewed the proposal during the
>> 2023 Issaquah meeting
>> <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21issaquah2023/NotesEWGstaticassert>,
>> during its 2024-01-31 telecon
>> <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2024/P2758R1-EWG>, and
>> in Tokyo
>> <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21tokyo2024/NotesEWGP2758>;
>> further review is pending LEWG review. As always, we'll discuss
>> encoding related matters but will try to avoid topics that are
>> not otherwise in our purview. Please note that static_assert, as
>> updated by P2741R3, requires that the /static_assert-message
>> <http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.pre#nt:static_assert-message>/ be
>> encoded in the ordinary literal encoding with use of
>> /universal-character-name
>> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>/
>> or /simple-escape-sequence
>> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence>/
>> restricted to the /unevaluated-string
>> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string.uneval#nt:unevaluated-string>/
>> form.
>>
>> We have other papers to review, but I am freshly back from
>> vacation and other authors are either unavailable or I haven't
>> made contact with them yet (and won't do so with such little
>> notice). So, this might be a short meeting.
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>

Received on 2024-04-10 15:05:07