Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 22:35:07 +0200
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 at 22:29, Steve Downey via SG16
<sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Neither is it useful to say that, picking some changes from the last few years, that C++{X} must not understand gender modifiers for emoji, must split Chinese glyphs incorrectly, and fail to understand Korean where it overlaps with other Asian languages.
It's much more useful to say that C++23 can't do those things, and
C++26 will, than saying that some C++23 implementations might or might
not
be able to do those things.
<sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Neither is it useful to say that, picking some changes from the last few years, that C++{X} must not understand gender modifiers for emoji, must split Chinese glyphs incorrectly, and fail to understand Korean where it overlaps with other Asian languages.
It's much more useful to say that C++23 can't do those things, and
C++26 will, than saying that some C++23 implementations might or might
not
be able to do those things.
Received on 2024-01-06 20:35:21