I hope to get back to it at some point this cycle.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 5:06 PM Jens Maurer via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

>
>
> On 02/03/2023 16.50, Daniel Krügler wrote:
> > Am Do., 2. März 2023 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb Jens Maurer via SG16
> > <sg16_at_[hidden]>:
> >>
> >> On 02/03/2023 16.28, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
> >>> That ICU apparently has poor performance in this area indicates a
> little that many users are OK with it. But it does also sound like there
> are use cases for eager algorithms that could provide better performance.
> Probably something like the ones that JeanHeyd was proposing for C?
> >>>
> >>> Incidentally, should the charconv functions get `span`ed? Those char*
> make me itch a little? Or would that be an ABI pessimization?
> >>
> >> <charconv> was intentionally designed to be a bare-bones interface
> >> where other abstractions can be layered on top.
> >>
> >> People have a number of ergonomics gripes about the interface,
> >> so feel free to propose wrappers that are "nicer" to use,
> >> if you feel you can make a bang-for-the-buck argument for a
> >> facility somewhere between (say) strtoul and <charconv>.
> >>
> >> Jens
> >
> > One proposal that springs to my mind would be
> >
> > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2584r0.pdf
>
> which is in need of addressing LEWG comments since August 2022,
> per https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1243
>
> Jens
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>