Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:09:35 +0000
Hi Jens and Corentin,
I think Jens is correct. My understanding is that we were polling to use exactly the same phrasing as used for __STDC_VERSION__.
Best regards,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Jens Maurer via SG16
Sent: 26 January 2023 17:07
This is not what I remember.
I thought we specifically wanted the phrasing from __STDC_VERSION__, i.e.
"An integer literal of the form yyyymmL (for example, 199712L).
Whether this symbol is predefined and if so, what its value is,
are implementation-defined."
I think Jens is correct. My understanding is that we were polling to use exactly the same phrasing as used for __STDC_VERSION__.
Best regards,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Jens Maurer via SG16
Sent: 26 January 2023 17:07
This is not what I remember.
I thought we specifically wanted the phrasing from __STDC_VERSION__, i.e.
"An integer literal of the form yyyymmL (for example, 199712L).
Whether this symbol is predefined and if so, what its value is,
are implementation-defined."
Received on 2023-01-26 17:09:43