Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:57:10 -1000
\N{\N{}} ?
No, I really don't see the value in that, unicode character names are
specified in a fixed set of characters, that is very unlikely to change
(because these names are designed to be usable in a context where
displaying/processing unicode is not possible)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 8:50 PM Hubert Tong via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Does it make sense to anticipate that we may want \N{} escapes within
> n-char sequences someday and allow nested brace pairs today to reduce churn?
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2640.html
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
No, I really don't see the value in that, unicode character names are
specified in a fixed set of characters, that is very unlikely to change
(because these names are designed to be usable in a context where
displaying/processing unicode is not possible)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 8:50 PM Hubert Tong via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Does it make sense to anticipate that we may want \N{} escapes within
> n-char sequences someday and allow nested brace pairs today to reduce churn?
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2640.html
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
Received on 2022-11-09 06:57:25