Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 12:44:03 -0400
The summary for the SG16 meeting held October 19th, 2022 is now
available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
* https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/#october-19th-2022
The following polls were taken:
* Poll 1: SG16 suggests to consider US-02 as "not a defect", but to
improve the presentation by editorially moving the definition of
"multibyte character" to [multibyte.strings]
<http://eel.is/c++draft/multibyte.strings>.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.1: [US-38] SG16 agrees that the formatted code units in the
escaped string are intended to be usable as a string literal that
reproduces the input.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.2: [US-38] SG16 agrees that the escaped string is intended to
be readable for its textual content in any Unicode script.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.3: [US-38] SG16 agrees that separators and non-printable
characters ([format.string.escaped]p(2.2.1.2)
<https://eel.is/c++draft/format.string.escaped>) shall be escaped in
the escaped string.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.4: [US-38] SG16 agrees that combining code points shall not
be escaped unless there is no leading code point or the previous
character was escaped.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 3: [US-64] SG16 agrees with resolving the issue in the
direction presented in the comment
o No objection to unanimous consent.
These poll results will be recorded in the nbballot github repository
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot> once it is populated with issues
for the C++23 NB comments.
Tom.
available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
* https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/#october-19th-2022
The following polls were taken:
* Poll 1: SG16 suggests to consider US-02 as "not a defect", but to
improve the presentation by editorially moving the definition of
"multibyte character" to [multibyte.strings]
<http://eel.is/c++draft/multibyte.strings>.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.1: [US-38] SG16 agrees that the formatted code units in the
escaped string are intended to be usable as a string literal that
reproduces the input.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.2: [US-38] SG16 agrees that the escaped string is intended to
be readable for its textual content in any Unicode script.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.3: [US-38] SG16 agrees that separators and non-printable
characters ([format.string.escaped]p(2.2.1.2)
<https://eel.is/c++draft/format.string.escaped>) shall be escaped in
the escaped string.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 2.4: [US-38] SG16 agrees that combining code points shall not
be escaped unless there is no leading code point or the previous
character was escaped.
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* Poll 3: [US-64] SG16 agrees with resolving the issue in the
direction presented in the comment
o No objection to unanimous consent.
These poll results will be recorded in the nbballot github repository
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot> once it is populated with issues
for the C++23 NB comments.
Tom.
Received on 2022-10-22 16:44:25