+1

wt., 26 kwi 2022, 23:06 użytkownik Inbal Levi via Lib-Ext <
lib-ext_at_[hidden]> napisał:

> Noted :)
>
> Let's* reopen this review with the new revision, R1*, proposing wording
> for* synchronizing std::print with the underlying stream:*
>
> P2539R1: Should the output of std::print to a terminal be synchronized
> with the underlying stream? (wg21.link/P2539 <http://wg21.link/P2539r1>)
> by: Victor Zverovich
>
> *Please vote +1 for supporting moving this change forward for C++23.*
>
> ***
>
> *From the Discussion:*
> To prevent mojibake std::print may use a native Unicode API when writing
> to a terminal bypassing the stream buffer. During the review of [P2093]
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r0.html#biblio-p2093> "Formatted
> output" Tim Song suggested that synchronizing std::print with the
> underlying stream may be beneficial for gradual adoption.
>
> *Some meta data:*
>
> - *Bottom Line: *Although the issue appears to be mostly theoretical,
> it might still be beneficial to clarify in the standard that
> synchronization is desired. Neither {fmt} ([FMT]) nor Rust (
> [RUST-STDIO]) do such synchronization in their implementations of print
> .
> - To indicate your opinion on whether a change is needed (reasoning
> is, of course, welcome):
> - If you support the status quo (no change): please response with *"No
> Change"*
> - If you support making the change *for C++23* (synchronize the
> output with the underlying steam): please response* "+1"*
>
> ***
>
> *Weekly reviews improve quality!*
> Running weekly reviews allows more iterations on each proposal, which
> hopefully, in turn, will result in more accurate and subtle fixes.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal,
> and have a great week!
>
> Inbal Levi
>
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 18:42, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:38 AM Corentin via Lib-Ext <
>> lib-ext_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey folks,
>>> Victor kindly provided a new revision with wording to flush the
>>> underlying stream upon writing
>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r1.html
>>>
>>> Please provide feedback on the paper/wording.
>>> Given the support for the direction last time, if we don't hear
>>> objections or new information, we will start a motion to send this paper to
>>> electronic polling.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Have a great day,
>>>
>>> Corentin.
>>>
>>
>> Preemptive +1 to electronic polling.
>>
>> Barry
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Lib-Ext mailing list
> Lib-Ext_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib-ext
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2022/04/23076.php
>