+1.

Tom.

On 4/26/22 5:05 PM, Inbal Levi via SG16 wrote:
> Noted :)
>
> Let's*reopen this review with the new revision, R1*, proposing wording
> for*synchronizing |std::print| with the underlying stream:*
> *
> *
> P2539R1: Should the output of std::print to a terminal be synchronized
> with the underlying stream? (wg21.link/P2539 <http://wg21.link/P2539r1>)
> by: Victor Zverovich
> *
> *
> *Please vote +1 for supporting moving this change forward for C++23.*
>
> ***
>
> *From the Discussion:*
> To prevent mojibake |std::print| may use a native Unicode API when
> writing to a terminal bypassing the stream buffer. During the review
> of [P2093]
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r0.html#biblio-p2093> "Formatted
> output" Tim Song suggested that synchronizing |std::print| with the
> underlying stream may be beneficial for gradual adoption.
> *
> *
> *Some meta data:*
>
> * *Bottom Line: *Although the issue appears to be mostly
> theoretical, it might still be beneficial to clarify in the
> standard that synchronization is desired. Neither {fmt} ([FMT])
> nor Rust ([RUST-STDIO]) do such synchronization in their
> implementations of |print|.
> * To indicate your opinion on whether a change is needed (reasoning
> is, of course, welcome):
> o If you support the status quo (no change): please response
> with *"No Change"*
> o If you support making the change *for C++23* (synchronize the
> output with the underlying steam): please response* "+1"*
>
> ***
> *
> Weekly reviews improve quality!*
> Running weekly reviews allows more iterations on each proposal, which
> hopefully, in turn, will result in more accurate and subtle fixes.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal,
> and have a great week!
>
> Inbal Levi
>
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 18:42, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:38 AM Corentin via Lib-Ext
> <lib-ext_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
> Victor kindly provided a new revision with wording to flush
> the underlying stream upon writing
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r1.html
>
> Please provide feedback on the paper/wording.
> Given the support for the direction last time, if we don't
> hear objections or new information, we will start a motion to
> send this paper to electronic polling.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Have a great day,
>
> Corentin.
>
>
> Preemptive +1 to electronic polling.
>
> Barry
>
>