Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:03:21 -0400
Peter Brett submitted WG2 N5168
<https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n5168R1-ISO10646.pdf> to ISO/IEC WG2
(the WG that produces ISO/IEC 10646) late last year. The paper notes
some deficiencies in ISO/IEC 10646 in comparison with the Unicode standard.
The WG2 project editor has since published WG2 N5174
<https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n5174-namesaliases.pdf> with a
proposed resolution for the concerns raised.
Please review the proposed resolution. If you believe there to be
outstanding issues, please respond here so that we can coordinate a
response to WG2. My brief review did not reveal any obvious deficiencies
in the proposed changes. If no concerns are raised in response, then
I'll assume that everyone is content with the proposed changes.
Tom.
<https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n5168R1-ISO10646.pdf> to ISO/IEC WG2
(the WG that produces ISO/IEC 10646) late last year. The paper notes
some deficiencies in ISO/IEC 10646 in comparison with the Unicode standard.
The WG2 project editor has since published WG2 N5174
<https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n5174-namesaliases.pdf> with a
proposed resolution for the concerns raised.
Please review the proposed resolution. If you believe there to be
outstanding issues, please respond here so that we can coordinate a
response to WG2. My brief review did not reveal any obvious deficiencies
in the proposed changes. If no concerns are raised in response, then
I'll assume that everyone is content with the proposed changes.
Tom.
Received on 2022-03-28 19:03:23