Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 18:05:53 -0600
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021, 5:23 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2021, at 5:00 PM, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Tom and other Unicoders,
>
> Can we review an updated revision of P2286 (
> https://brevzin.github.io/cpp_proposals/2286_fmt_ranges/p2286r4.html)
> during the upcoming meeting since there is still chance that it can target
> C++23? This revision addresses the SG16 feedback, particularly around
> escaping (
> https://brevzin.github.io/cpp_proposals/2286_fmt_ranges/p2286r4.html#escaping-behavior).
> I think it's way more important and time sensitive than LWG issues related
> to fill.
>
>
> I agree, the LWG issues can be addressed any time during the C++23 cycle.
> We’ll therefore discuss the updated P2286 next week after Corentin’s
> papers. Thanks to you and Barry for turning out a new revision so quickly!
>
> Tom.
>
This was 99.5% Victor. I copied and pasted and added some formatting (much
meta).
Barry
>
> On Dec 11, 2021, at 5:00 PM, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Tom and other Unicoders,
>
> Can we review an updated revision of P2286 (
> https://brevzin.github.io/cpp_proposals/2286_fmt_ranges/p2286r4.html)
> during the upcoming meeting since there is still chance that it can target
> C++23? This revision addresses the SG16 feedback, particularly around
> escaping (
> https://brevzin.github.io/cpp_proposals/2286_fmt_ranges/p2286r4.html#escaping-behavior).
> I think it's way more important and time sensitive than LWG issues related
> to fill.
>
>
> I agree, the LWG issues can be addressed any time during the C++23 cycle.
> We’ll therefore discuss the updated P2286 next week after Corentin’s
> papers. Thanks to you and Barry for turning out a new revision so quickly!
>
> Tom.
>
This was 99.5% Victor. I copied and pasted and added some formatting (much
meta).
Barry
Received on 2021-12-11 18:06:08