Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 21:04:33 +0100
+1
On 02/12/2021 18.33, Corentin via SG16 wrote:
> Hello,
> I was asked, again, to notify you that P2361 (unevaluated string) has been revised http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf>
>
> Last couple of times we have seen this, we mostly discussed wording, and my understanding is that we are happy with the design and the intent.
>
> It would make my life easier if that was seen by EWG sooner rather than later.
>
> At Tom's request, can you reply +1 to this paper if you want to see it forwarded to EWG at the next SG-16 meeting?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Corentin
>
On 02/12/2021 18.33, Corentin via SG16 wrote:
> Hello,
> I was asked, again, to notify you that P2361 (unevaluated string) has been revised http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf>
>
> Last couple of times we have seen this, we mostly discussed wording, and my understanding is that we are happy with the design and the intent.
>
> It would make my life easier if that was seen by EWG sooner rather than later.
>
> At Tom's request, can you reply +1 to this paper if you want to see it forwarded to EWG at the next SG-16 meeting?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Corentin
>
Received on 2021-12-02 14:04:39