C++ Logo

SG16

Advanced search

Subject: Re: Agenda for the 2021-07-14 SG16 telecon
From: Corentin Jabot (corentinjabot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-07-11 03:26:43


Hello,
We added a note to explicitly say that we expect implementation to provide
a command line option.
I am sure that core will want to tweak that note, but hopefully it leaves
little room for interpretation

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 12:12 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, July 14th at 19:30 UTC (timezone
> conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210714T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pdt&p3=tz_mdt&p4=tz_cdt&p5=tz_edt&p6=tz_cest>
> ).
>
> The agenda is:
>
> - P2295R4: Support for UTF-8 as a portable source file encoding
> <https://wg21.link/p2295r4>
> - Review updated wording produced through collaboration between
> Corentin, Jens, Hubert, and Peter.
> - https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/04/2353.php
> - https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/06/2429.php
> - P2362R0: Make obfuscating wide character literals ill-formed
> <https://wg21.link/p2362r0>
> - LWG 3565: Handling of encodings in localized formatting of chrono
> types is underspecified <https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3565>
> - Discuss and poll the proposed resolution.
>
> The agenda is a result of discussion between Peter and I; we feel that
> further information is needed to improve consensus for P2093R6
> <https://wg21.link/p2093r6> and no such information has appeared since
> the last telecon. We'll therefore take a break from that paper to allow
> for progress on other papers.
>
> We've had several discussions regarding the wording for P2295. Please
> review the latest wording in P2295R4 <https://wg21.link/p2295r4> and, if
> *objections* (not just desired tweajs) remain, reply to this email to
> state them ahead of the meeting. My intention is to poll forwarding this
> paper with the expectation that core will further tweak the wording pending
> EWG acceptance. The SG16 obligation is to ensure that the intent of the
> paper is clear and that the proposed wording reasonably reflects it; I
> don't want to hold this paper up further unless it is felt that the wording
> misrepresents the intent.
>
> Based on our prior discussions of P2093R6 <https://wg21.link/p2093r6>,
> I'm anticipating considerable discussion will be needed for LWG 3565
> <https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3565>. It has been moved to the
> end of the agenda in hopes that we'll be able to dispense with the other
> papers first and then spend the remaining time on it.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>





SG16 list run by sg16-owner@lists.isocpp.org