Subject: Re: [isocpp-lib-ext] Questions for LEWG for P2093R4: Formatted output
From: Tom Honermann (tom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-04-28 10:19:01
On 4/27/21 2:46 PM, Fabio Fracassi via Lib-Ext wrote:
> On 27.04.21 16:53, Tom Honermann via Lib-Ext wrote:
>> On 4/27/21 9:56 AM, Victor Zverovich wrote:
>>> Sure, as I wrote:
>>> >Â Â there might be issues with other cases (as expected)
>>> This is anotherÂ data point in favor of fixing locales.
>> No disagreement there, but that is not a trivial undertaking. The
>> question is, what do we do in the meantime?
>> I think the LWG issue that Corentin just submitted (Time formatters
>> should not be locale sensitive by default; only sent to the LWG chair
>> and SG16 mailing list) would be a good thing to resolve as a C++20
>> DR.Â We could then add locale support via the 'L' specifier when we're
>> ready to do it right.
> The window on that is closing very rappidly ... it might already be to
> late (see http://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2021/04/18688.php).
Indeed.Â SG16 will be discussing this at our telecon today. Assuming we
reach consensus, I'll share our recommendation with LEWG and LWG.
SG16 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org