Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:41:44 -0400
On 4/26/21 1:42 PM, Corentin via SG16 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As Tom pointed out in his earlier email,
> my paper on whitespaces is available wg21.link/P2348R0
>
> And while I'm sure we all agree this is the most important feature of 23,
> I do not want to detract SG-16 from std::print and others more...
> visible matters.
>
> As such I would love any feedback on this paper by mail.
> My intent is for it to be a non-breaking, non-evolutionary,
> clarifying, core-issues fixing paper.
> It does not extend the set of line breaks outside of what is
> representable in ASCII.
>
> I want to make sure we agree on the terminology.
Thanks, Corentin.
>
> I'll be happy to answer any questions :)
> I'll be even more happy if we can agree that this can go straight to core.
Whether SG16 agrees that this is strictly a core issue doesn't matter;
that determination is up to the EWG and CWG chairs.
Tom.
>
> And of course we can talk about it Wednesday.
>
> Have a great week,
>
> Corentin
>
> PS: If you want to extend the set of supported whitespaces, I don't
> think this is the paper to do it. The scope is strictly wording
> improvement.
Clear and constrained scope, I love that! :)
Tom.
> Hello,
>
> As Tom pointed out in his earlier email,
> my paper on whitespaces is available wg21.link/P2348R0
>
> And while I'm sure we all agree this is the most important feature of 23,
> I do not want to detract SG-16 from std::print and others more...
> visible matters.
>
> As such I would love any feedback on this paper by mail.
> My intent is for it to be a non-breaking, non-evolutionary,
> clarifying, core-issues fixing paper.
> It does not extend the set of line breaks outside of what is
> representable in ASCII.
>
> I want to make sure we agree on the terminology.
Thanks, Corentin.
>
> I'll be happy to answer any questions :)
> I'll be even more happy if we can agree that this can go straight to core.
Whether SG16 agrees that this is strictly a core issue doesn't matter;
that determination is up to the EWG and CWG chairs.
Tom.
>
> And of course we can talk about it Wednesday.
>
> Have a great week,
>
> Corentin
>
> PS: If you want to extend the set of supported whitespaces, I don't
> think this is the paper to do it. The scope is strictly wording
> improvement.
Clear and constrained scope, I love that! :)
Tom.
Received on 2021-04-26 13:41:46