Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:17:40 +0200
Talking with Peter, we realized we could provide only the u8 overload and
mandates that the existing locale be specialize for char8_t
We believe this would
- Satisfy Victor's excellent remark about the need not to be
gratuitously inconsistent
- Put minimum strain on implementers
- Let us move forward with having a Unicode overload in 23.
mandates that the existing locale be specialize for char8_t
We believe this would
- Satisfy Victor's excellent remark about the need not to be
gratuitously inconsistent
- Put minimum strain on implementers
- Let us move forward with having a Unicode overload in 23.
Received on 2021-04-19 05:17:54