Subject: Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-10-01 06:10:28
Dear SG16 and Billy,
Please find attached draft 1 of the proposed normative wording for P1030
path_view targeting the C++ 23 IS.
There are likely code correctness mistakes in the current proposed
wording, as it has diverged quite a bit from the reference
implementation. Over the next few weeks I intend to port the reference
implementation to this IS spec.
Nevertheless, I would appreciate SG16 sign off on this draft 1 wording
before it heads to LEWG for review, and any comment from LEWG or LWG or
standard library implementers are of course always welcome.
SG16 list run by email@example.com