Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:24:18 +0200
On 01/09/2020 22.07, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 wrote:
> Remember, after phase 1 all of those string literals /are/ encoded directly in the basic source character set. The question is whether we expect implementations to reverse those UCN encodings when displaying/interpreting those strings?
- Whether such UCN encoding is done or not is intended to be
an unobservable specification vehicle.
- There are attempts afoot to use Unicode (or a superset thereof)
as the translation character set.
Jens
> Remember, after phase 1 all of those string literals /are/ encoded directly in the basic source character set. The question is whether we expect implementations to reverse those UCN encodings when displaying/interpreting those strings?
- Whether such UCN encoding is done or not is intended to be
an unobservable specification vehicle.
- There are attempts afoot to use Unicode (or a superset thereof)
as the translation character set.
Jens
Received on 2020-09-01 15:27:51