On 08/07/2020 18.37, Jens Maurer via SG16 wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 13.09, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 wrote:
>> After taking another look over P2029 resolving a few core issues,
>> I am further concerned by [lex.string]p11, which states (among
>> other things) that concatenation of unicode string literals with
>> different encoding-prefixes is conditionally supported with
>> implementation-defined behavior. That seems a little to free for
>> my tastes.
>
> This is pre-existing and unchanged from the status quo.
>
> [lex.string] p11
> "Any other concatenations are conditionally-supported with implementation-defined behavior."
>
> If you want a change here, it should be a separate paper.

I just realized you're not asking this be addressed in P2029.
Good.

Please excuse my confusion.

Jens