C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Correction re: POSIXLY_CORRECT reference in today's call

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 02:49:19 -0400
On 3/25/20 5:10 PM, Hubert Tong via SG16 wrote:
> Maybe it was -std=c++11 versus -std=gnu++11 but I definitely
> encountered a difference in the regex matching behaviour given one
> trigger or another.

Thanks, Hubert. In the meeting summary I just sent out, I substituted a
generic statement to this effect. Please let me know if you would like
it changed to something more specific.



Received on 2020-04-04 01:52:13