Subject: Comment on P1885R0: Naming Text Encodings to Demystify Them
From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-23 14:57:03
We talked quite a bit about this paper in the teleconference.
I have another concern: The core language defines the
terms "execution character set" and "execution wide-character set"
The wording in the paper should use exactly these phrases, with
an appropriate cross-reference.
Given these definitions, I'm a bit concern about the name of
the member function "literal". If it wants to talk about the
execution character set, it should state so in its name.
SG16 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org