Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:17:24 -0500
I don't believe that "execution character set" is quite the right term,
however I also believe that there isn't quite the right term in the
standard to describe the encoding used at compile time for the values of
members of the execution character set. In [lex.charset] the standard
defers to 'locale' for that:
http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#3.sentence-5
"The values of the members of the execution character sets and the sets of
additional members are locale-specific.
<http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#3.sentence-5> "
See P1859R0 <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P1859R0.html> for early draft
on terminology for execution character set encoding.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:19 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> On 1/8/20 2:48 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused.
> >
> > There is
> >
> > On 08/01/2020 07.53, Tom Honermann via Core wrote:
> >> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 3:
> > but no red/green-marked changes follow for that paragraph.
> > (This appears a few times.)
>
> Thanks, Jens. There are no intended changes to those paragraphs, but I
> forgot to update their introduction to make that clear. I retained
> these paragraphs for ease of review given how pervasive the proposed
> changes are to [lex.ccon] and [lex.string]. I've attached an updated
> draft that states that no changes are made to those paragraphs and to
> highlight them with a blue background. I hope that is helpful.
>
> Tom.
>
> >
> > Jens
>
>
> Document Number: DXXXXR0 *Draft*
> Date: 2020-01-08
> Audience: CWG
> Reply-to: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> Proposed resolution for core
> issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in
> character and string literals
>
> This paper proposes substantial changes to [lex.phases]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>, [lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>, and [lex.string]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string> intended to address the following
> core issues as well as several other more minor issues.
>
> - Core Issue 411: Use of universal-character-name in character versus
> string literals <http://wg21.link/cwg411>
> - Core Issue 1656: Encoding of numerically-escaped characters
> <http://wg21.link/cwg1656>
> - Core Issue 2333: Escape sequences in UTF-8 character literals
> <http://wg21.link/cwg2333>
>
> This paper follows a prior proposed resolution
> <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21kona2019/CoreWorkingGroup/cwg2333.html> that
> only attempted to address CWG 2333 <http://wg21.link/cwg2333>. That
> proposed resolution was discussed on the core mailing list
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/core/2019/01/5395.php> and at the June 24th,
> 2019 core issues processing teleconference
> <http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21cologne2019/CoreIssuesProcessingTeleconference2019-06-24>.
> The resolution proposed in this paper attempts to address the feedback
> provided during those discussions.
>
> The notes for CWG 2333 <http://wg21.link/cwg2333> in the current active
> issues list (revision 100) state that discussion at the August 14th, 2017
> core issues processing teleconference
> <http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21albuquerque/IssuesTeleconference2017-08-14>
> resulted in a determination that numeric escape sequences in UTF-8
> character literals should be ill-formed. The issue has remained in drafting
> status since then.
>
> SG16 discussed this issue during its October 17th, 2018 teleconference
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#october-17th-2018>. The
> SG16 consensus was for a different resolution than is currently described
> in the active issues list. The SG16 consensus was based on the following
> observations:
>
> - The current resolution in the active issues list contradicts
> existing practice. gcc, Clang, and Visual C++ all allow octal and
> hexadecimal escape sequences in UTF-8 literals.
> - Octal and hexadecimal escape sequences in UTF-8 literals are useful
> for a number of purposes:
> - Embedding null characters: u8"\0"
> - Creating ill-formed code unit sequences for testing purposes.
> - Creating Modified UTF-8, CESU-8, and WTF-8 string literals. This
> entails two abilities:
> - Embedding U+0000 as an overlong UTF-8 sequence: u8"\xC0\x80"
> - Embedding lone surrogate code points as individual UTF-8 code
> unit sequences. For example, encoding U+D800 as u8"\xED\xA0\x80".
> (Note that use of \u escapes specifying surrogate code points is
> ill-formed).
> - Compatibility with existing log/debug systems that output
> literals with non-printable characters represented with escapes so as to
> facilitate copy/paste of such output into code.
>
> SG16 conducted the following poll:
> Continue to allow hex and octal escapes that indicate code unit values,
> requiring only that they fit into the range of the code unit type?
> SF F N A SA
> 8 1 0 0 0
> In the polled question, "Continue" refers to existing implementation
> behavior; to maintain the current implementation status quo exhibited by
> gcc, Clang and Visual C++.
>
> The proposed resolution reflects the SG16 consensus.
>
> CWG 411 <http://wg21.link/cwg411> is addressed by specifying different
> behavior for character literals vs string literals for characters that are
> not representable by a single code unit. For example, when the execution
> character set is UTF-8, '\u0153' is conditionally-supported, has type int
> and an implementation-defined value, but "\u0153" is a character array of
> length 3 containing the UTF-8 encoding of U+0153 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE)
> and a null character (\xC5\x93\x00).
>
> CWG 1656 <http://wg21.link/cwg1656> is addressed by clarifying that
> numeric escape sequences denote code unit values in the execution character
> set; that the values are not subject to conversion from the encoding of the
> source file to the execution character set.
> Proposed resolution overview
>
> The proposed wording changes are intended to resolve CWG 411
> <http://wg21.link/cwg411>, CWG 1656 <http://wg21.link/cwg1656>, and CWG
> 2333 <http://wg21.link/cwg2333> by:
>
> - Clarifying that hexadecimal and octal escape sequences:
> - are valid in u8, u, and U character literals. (CWG 2333)
> - specify values that need not correspond to valid code unit values
> for the applicable character encoding. (CWG 2333)
> - specify the execution-time value of character literals or
> individual code unit values of string literals; that the value expressed is
> not subject to conversion to the applicable execution character set. (CWG
> 1656)
> - specify values that may result in string literals that are
> ill-formed according to their applicable character encoding (CWG 2333).
> - Clarifying that characters that cannot be specified in a character
> literal because they require more than one code unit in the applicable
> character encoding may be specified in string literals. (CWG 411)
>
> The concept of an "associated encoding" is introduced for character and
> string literals so as to enable wording to be independent of the particular
> kind of literal (ordinary, wide or Unicode).
>
> New basic-c-char, basic-s-char, and numeric-escape-sequence grammar
> productions are proposed in order to simplify wording. The c-char, s-char,
> and escape-sequence grammar productions are updated to define them in
> terms of the new grammar productions.
>
> Additionally, the wording updates are intended to:
>
> - Specify behavior for non-ordinary character and string literals when
> a character lacks representation in the applicable character encoding.
> (Wording was previously missing)
> - Specify behavior for simple-escape-sequences that denote characters
> that lack representation in the applicable character encoding. (Wording was
> previously missing)
> - Remove wording that states that wchar_t is able to represent all
> members of the execution wide-character set as this contradicts wide spread
> existing practice (SG16 has an issue tracking this at
> https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues/9).
> - Modernize the wording with current style preferences and terminology.
>
> Proposed resolution
>
> These changes are relative to N4835
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/n4835.pdf>.
>
> The changes to [lex.ccon] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon> and
> [lex.string] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string> are rather pervasive.
> For ease of review, unchanged paragraphs in these sections are retained in
> the wording below. These paragraphs are introduced with "*No* changes to
> ..." and are highlighted with a blue background.
>
> These changes do not reflect recent editorial changes made in
> https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/2768; merge conflict resolution
> will be required.
> Hide inserted text
> Hide deleted text
>
> Change in 5.2 [lex.phases] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.5>:
> *Drafting Note:* The change of "escape sequence" to "
> simple-escape-sequence" addresses CWG 1656 <http://wg21.link/cwg1656>.
>
> Each basic source character set memberbasic-c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:basic-c-char>, basic-s-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:basic-s-char>, and r-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char> in a character literal or a
> string literal, as well as each escape sequencesimple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> and
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> in a
> character literal or a non-raw string literal, is converted to the corresponding
> member of the execution character setliteral's associated encoding (
> [lex.ccon] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>, [lex.string]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string>);. if there is no corresponding
> member, it is If a character lacks representation in the associated
> encoding, then the character is converted to an implementation-defined
> character or the literal is ill-formed as specified in [lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon> and [lex.string]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string>. 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#footnote-8>
>
> Change in 5.2 [lex.phases] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.7>:
> *Drafting note:* This addition duplicates wording in [lex.string], but
> seems important to include here.
>
> A null character is appended to every string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>. White-space
> characters separating tokens are no longer significant. Each preprocessing
> token is converted into a token ([lex.token]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.token>). The resulting tokens are
> syntactically and semantically analyzed and translated as a translation
> unit. [ *Note:* The process of analyzing and translating the tokens may
> occasionally result in one token being replaced by a sequence of other
> tokens ([temp.names] <http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names>). — *end note* ]
> It is implementation-defined whether the sources for module units and
> header units on which the current translation unit has an interface
> dependency ([module.unit] <http://eel.is/c++draft/module.unit>,
> [module.import] <http://eel.is/c++draft/module.import>) are required to
> be available. [ *Note:* Source files, translation units and translated
> translation units need not necessarily be stored as files, nor need there
> be any one-to-one correspondence between these entities and any external
> representation. The description is conceptual only, and does not specify
> any particular implementation. — *end note* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>:
>
> character-literal: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:character-literal>
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>opt '
> c-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence> '
>
> encoding-prefix: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix> one
> of
> u8 u U L
>
> c-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence>
> c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>
> c-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence>
> c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>
>
> c-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>
> any member of the basic source character set except the single-quote ',
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
> basic-c-char
> escape-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:escape-sequence>
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>
>
> basic-c-char:
> any member of the basic source character set except the single-quote ',
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
>
> escape-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:escape-sequence>
> simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence>
> octal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:octal-escape-sequence>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
> numeric-escape-sequence
>
> simple-escape-sequence:
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> one of
> \' \" \? \\
> \a \b \f \n \r \t \v
>
> numeric-escape-sequence:
> octal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:octal-escape-sequence>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
>
> octal-escape-sequence:
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:octal-escape-sequence>
> \ octal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit>
> \ octal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit> octal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit>
> \ octal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit> octal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit> octal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit>
>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence:
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
> \x hexadecimal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:hexadecimal-digit>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
> hexadecimal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:hexadecimal-digit>
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#1>:
>
> A character literal*character literal* is one or more charactersa
> c-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence>
> enclosed in single quotes, as in 'x''v', optionally preceded by u8, u, U,
> or Lan encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>, as in u8'w', u'x',
> U'y', or L'z', respectively.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 2
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#2>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter literals, characters that
> lack representation in the execution character set, and the value of a
> character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that does not begin with u8, u, U, or L an
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>,
> such as 'v', is an *ordinary character literal*, has type char unless
> otherwise specified to have type int as described below, and has the
> execution character set ([lex.charset]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) as its associated encoding. An
> ordinary character literal that contains a single c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> representable in the
> execution character set has type char, with value equal to the numerical
> value of the encoding of the c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> in the execution character
> set. An ordinary character literal that contains more than one c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> is a *multicharacter literal*.
> A multicharacter literal, or an ordinary character literal containing a
> single c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> not
> representable in the execution character set, is conditionally-supported,
> has type int, and has an implementation-defined value.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 3
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#3>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter UTF-8 literals, characters
> that cannot be represented in a single UTF-8 code unit, and the value of a
> UTF-8 character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that begins with u8, such as u8'w', is a character
> literal of type char8_t, known as a *UTF-8 character literal*, has type
> char8_t, and has UTF-8 as its associated character encoding. The value of
> a UTF-8 character literal is equal to its ISO/IEC 10646 code point value,
> provided that the code point value can be encoded as a single UTF-8 code
> unit. [ *Note:* That is, provided the code point value is in the range
> 0x0-0x7F (inclusive). — *end note* ] If the value is not representable
> with a single UTF-8 code unit, the program is ill-formed. A UTF-8 character
> literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is ill-formed.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 4
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#4>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter UTF-16 literals, characters
> that cannot be represented in a single UTF-16 code unit, and the value of a
> UTF-16 character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that begins with the letter u, such as u'x', is a character
> literal of type char16_t, known as a *UTF-16 character literal*, has type
> char16_t, and has UTF-16 as its associated character encoding. The value
> of a UTF-16 character literal is equal to its ISO/IEC 10646 code point
> value, provided that the code point value is representable with a single
> 16-bit code unit. [ *Note:* That is, provided the code point value is in
> the range 0x0-0xFFFF (inclusive). — *end note* ] If the value is not
> representable with a single 16-bit code unit, the program is ill-formed. A
> UTF-16 character literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is ill-formed.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#5>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter UTF-32 literals, and the
> value of a UTF-32 character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that begins with the letter U, such as U'y', is a character
> literal of type char32_t, known as a *UTF-32 character literal*, has type
> char32_t, and has UTF-32 as its associated character encoding. The value
> of a UTF-32 character literal containing a single c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> is equal to its ISO/IEC 10646
> code point value. A UTF-32 character literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is ill-formed.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 6
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#6>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter wide literals, and the value
> of a wide character literal has been moved to new paragraphs. The note
> regarding the ability for wchar_t to store all values of the execution
> wide-character set is intentionally removed as it conflicts with long
> standing existing practice (https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues/9).
>
>
> A character literal that begins with the letter L, such as L'z', is a *wide-character
> literal*, has type wchar_t18 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-18>,
> and has the execution wide-character set ([lex.charset]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) as its associated character encoding
> . A wide-character literal has type wchar_t.18
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-18> The value of a
> wide-character literal containing a single c-char has value equal to the
> numerical value of the encoding of the c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> in the execution
> wide-character set, unless the c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> has no representation in the
> execution wide-character set, in which case the value is
> implementation-defined. [ *Note:* The type wchar_t is able to represent
> all members of the execution wide-character set (see [basic.fundamental]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.fundamental>). — *end note* ] The value of
> a wide-character literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is implementation-defined.
>
> Add a new paragraph after 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 6
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#6>:
>
> A character literal with a c-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence> containing more than
> one c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>, as in 'abcd', is
> a *multicharacter literal*. An ordinary character literal that is a
> multicharacter literal is conditionally supported, has type int, and has
> an implementation-defined value. A wide-character literal that is a
> multicharacter literal has an implementation-defined value. A UTF-8
> character literal, UTF-16 character literal, or UTF-32 character literal
> that is a multicharacter literal is ill-formed.
>
> Add another new paragraph (X):
>
> The value of a character literal consisting of a single basic-c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:basic-c-char>, simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence>, or
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is the
> code point value of the specified character encoded according to the
> character literal's associated encoding. If the character lacks
> representation in the associated encoding, then:
> (X.1) — for an ordinary character literal, the literal is conditionally
> supported, has type int, and has an implementation-defined value that is
> not the null character value.
> (X.2) — for a wide-character literal, the literal has an
> implementation-defined value that is not the null wide character value.
> (X.3) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 character literal, the literal is
> ill-formed. If the character requires multiple code units to be encoded
> in the associated encoding, then:
> (X.4) — for an ordinary character literal, the literal is conditionally
> supported, has type int, and has an implementation-defined value that is
> not the null character value.
> (X.5) — for a wide-character literal, the literal has an
> implementation-defined value that is not the null wide character value.
> (X.6) — for a UTF-8 or UTF-16 character literal, the literal is
> ill-formed. *[ Note:* UTF-32 never requires multiple code units for an
> encoded character. *— end note ]*
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#7>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for additional conditionally-supported simple
> escape sequences has been moved to a new paragraph.
>
> The character specified by a simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> is specified
> in table 8 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc>. *[ Note:*
> The execution character sets do not require representation for the new-line
> (NL), horizontal tab (HT), vertical tab (VT), or form feed (FF)
> characters ([lex.charset] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>); the
> UTF-8, UTF-16, and UTF-32 encodings are able to represent all of the
> simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> characters
> using a single code unit. *— end note ]* Certain non-graphic characters,
> the single quote ', the double quote ", the question mark ?,19
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-19> and the backslash \, can be
> represented according to Table 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc>. The double quote "
> and the question mark ?, can be represented as themselves or by the
> escape sequences \" and \? respectively, but the single quote ' and the
> backslash \ shall be represented by the escape sequences \' and \\
> respectively. Escape sequences in which the character following the
> backslash is not listed in Table 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc> are
> conditionally-supported, with implementation-defined semantics. An escape
> sequence specifies a single character.
>
> Table 8 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc>: ESimple escape
> sequences [tab:lex.ccon.esc]
> new-line NL(LF) \n
> horizontal tab HT \t
> vertical tab VT \v
> backspace BS \b
> carriage return CR \r
> form feed FF \f
> alert BEL \a
> backslash \ \\
> question mark 19 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-19> ? \?
> single quote ' \'
> double quote " \"
> octal number ooo \ooo
> hex number hhh \xhhh
>
> Add a new paragraph after 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#7>:
>
> Additional simple escape sequences in which the character following the
> backslash is not listed in Table 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc> are
> conditionally-supported, with implementation-defined semantics.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#8>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording describing the form of octal and hexadecimal
> escape sequences has been removed as redundant; the form is implicit in the
> grammar.
>
> The value of a character literal consisting of a single
> numeric-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:numeric-escape-sequence> is the
> numeric value of the octal or hexadecimal number. The escape \ooo
> consists of the backslash followed by one, two, or three octal digits that
> are taken to specify the value of the desired character. The escape \xhhh
> consists of the backslash followed by x followed by one or more
> hexadecimal digits that are taken to specify the value of the desired
> character. There is no limit to the number of digits in a hexadecimal
> sequence. A sequence of octal or hexadecimal digits is terminated by the
> first character that is not an octal digit or a hexadecimal digit,
> respectively. The value of a character literal is implementation-defined
> if it falls outside of the implementation-defined range defined for char
> (for character literals with no prefix) or wchar_t (for character
> literals prefixed by L). *[ Note:* If the value of a character literal
> prefixed by u, u8, or U is outside the range defined for its type, the
> program is ill-formed. *— end note ]*If the numeric value exceeds the
> range of the character literal type, then:
> (8.1) — for an ordinary character literal, the value is
> implementation-defined.
> (8.2) — for a wide character literal, the value is implementation-defined.
> (8.3) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 character literal, the literal is
> ill-formed.
>
> Delete 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 9 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#9>:
> *Drafting Note:* The normative text was combined with wording for
> basic-c-char and simple-escape-sequence above. The deleted note
> duplicates normative text in 5.2 [lex.phases] paragraph 1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.1>.
>
> A universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is
> translated to the encoding, in the appropriate execution character set, of
> the character named. If there is no such encoding, the
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is
> translated to an implementation-defined encoding. [ *Note:* In
> translation phase 1, a universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is
> introduced whenever an actual extended character is encountered in the
> source text. Therefore, all extended characters are described in terms of
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s
> However, the actual compiler implementation may use its own native
> character set, so long as the same results are obtained. — *end note* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string>:
>
> string-literal: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>opt "
> s-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence>opt
> "
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>opt R
> raw-string <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>
>
> s-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence>
> s-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>
> s-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence>
> s-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>
>
> s-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>
> any member of the basic source character set except the double-quote ",
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
> basic-s-char
> escape-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:escape-sequence>
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>
>
> basic-s-char:
> any member of the basic source character set except the double-quote ",
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
>
> raw-string: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>
> " d-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> opt ( r-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char-sequence>opt )
> d-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>opt
> "
>
> r-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char-sequence>
> r-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>
> r-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char-sequence>
> r-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>
>
> r-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>
> any member of the source character set, except a right parenthesis )
> followed by
> the initial d-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence> (which may be
> empty) followed by a double quote ".
>
> d-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> d-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char>
> d-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> d-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char>
>
> d-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char>
> any member of the source character set except:
> space, the left parenthesis (, the right parenthesis ), the backslash \,
> and the control characters
> representing horizontal tab, vertical tab, form feed, and newline.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#1>:
>
> A *string-literal* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> is
> a sequence of characters (as defined in [lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>) surrounded by double quotes,
> optionally prefixed by R, u8, u8R, u, uR, U, UR, L, or LR, as in "...",
> R"(...)", u8"...", u8R"**(...)**", u"...", uR"*~(...)*~", U"...",
> UR"zzz(...)zzz", L"...", or LR"(...)", respectively.is one of the
> following optionally preceded by an encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>:
> (1.1) — an optional s-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence> enclosed in double
> quotes as in "", "abc", u8"def", u"ghi", U"jkl", or L"mno".
> (1.2) — a raw-string <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>
> preceded by R as in R"()", R"(ABC)", u8R"**(DEF)**", uR"*~(GHI)*~",
> UR"zzz(JKL)zzz", or LR"(MNO)".
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 2
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#2>:
>
> A *string-literal* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that has an R in the prefix is a *raw string literal*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#def:raw_string_literal>. The
> *d-char-sequence* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> serves as a delimiter. The terminating *d-char-sequence*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence> of a *raw-string*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string> is the same sequence of
> characters as the initial *d-char-sequence*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>. A
> *d-char-sequence* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> shall consist of at most 16 characters.
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 3
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#3>:
>
> [ *Note:* The characters '(' and ')' are permitted in a *raw-string*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>. Thus,
> R"delimiter((a|b))delimiter" is equivalent to "(a|b)". — *end note* ]
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 4
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#4>:
>
> [ *Note:* A source-file new-line in a raw string literal results in a
> new-line in the resulting execution string literal. Assuming no whitespace
> at the beginning of lines in the following example, the assert will
> succeed:
>
> const char* p = R"(a\
> b
> c)";
> assert(std::strcmp(p, "a\\\nb\nc") == 0);
>
> — *end note* ]
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#5>:
>
> [ *Example:* The raw string
>
> R"a(
> )\
> a"
> )a"
>
> is equivalent to "\n)\\\na\"\n". The raw string
>
> R"(x = "\"y\"")"
>
> is equivalent to "x = \"\\\"y\\\"\"". — *end example* ]
>
> Add a new paragraph after 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#5>:
>
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>s
> have type "array of *n* const *CHAR_T*" where *CHAR_T* is the
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s
> associated code unit type, and *n* is the number of code units required
> to represent the contents of the string after translation phase 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.7> ([lex.phases]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>) in the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s associated
> encoding.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 6
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#6>:
> *Drafting note:* The wording regarding translation phase 6 has been
> removed as inaccurate; string contents are not fully known until after
> phase 7. Wording regarding the translation phase dependency and the
> literal's type has been moved to the new paragraph above. Wording for
> storage duration and string literal initialization has been moved to a new
> paragraph.
>
> After translation phase 6, aA string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> that does not begin
> with an encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix> is an *ordinary
> string literal*, has type char as its associated code unit type, and has
> the execution character set ([lex.charset]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) as its associated character encoding
> . An ordinary string literal has type "array of *n* const char" where *n*
> is the size of the string as defined below, has static storage duration (
> [basic.stc] <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc>), and is initialized with
> the given characters.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#7>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with u8, such as u8"asdf", is a *UTF-8 string literal*, has
> type char8_t as its associated code unit type, and has UTF-8 as its
> associated character encoding. A UTF-8 string literal has type "array of
> *n* const char8_t", where *n* is the size of the string as defined below;
> each successive element of the object representation ([basic.types]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.types>) has the value of the corresponding
> code unit of the UTF-8 encoding of the string.
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#8>:
>
> Ordinary string literals and UTF-8 string literals are also referred to as
> narrow string literals.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 9
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#9>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs. The note has been deleted as redundant;
> the use of surrogate pairs is explicit in the UTF-16 encoding.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with u, such as u"asdf", is a *UTF-16 string literal*, has
> type char16_t as its associated code unit type, and has UTF-16 as its
> associated character encoding. A UTF-16 string literal has type "array of
> *n* const char16_t", where *n* is the size of the string as defined
> below; each successive element of the array has the value of the
> corresponding code unit of the UTF-16 encoding of the string. [ *Note:* A
> single c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> may produce
> more than one char16_t character in the form of surrogate pairs. A
> surrogate pair is a representation for a single code point as a sequence of
> two 16-bit code units. — *end note* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 10
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#10>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with U, such as U"asdf", is a *UTF-32 string literal*, has
> type char32_t as its associated code unit type, and has UTF-32 as its
> associated character encoding. A UTF-32 string literal has type "array of
> *n* const char32_t", where *n* is the size of the string as defined
> below; each successive element of the array has the value of the
> corresponding code unit of the UTF-32 encoding of the string.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 11
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#11>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with L, such as L"asdf", is a *wide string literal*, has type
> wchar_t as its associated code unit type, and has the execution
> wide-character set ([lex.charset] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>)
> as its associated character encoding. A wide string literal has type
> "array of *n* const wchar_t", where *n* is the size of the string as
> defined below; it is initialized with the given characters.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 12
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#12>:
>
> In translation phase 6 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>, adjacent
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>s are
> concatenated. If both string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>s have the same
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>, the
> resulting concatenated string literal has that encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>. If one
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> has
> no encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>,
> it is treated as a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> of the same
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix> as
> the other operand. If a UTF-8 string literal token is adjacent to a wide
> string literal token, the program is ill-formed. Any other concatenations
> are conditionally-supported with implementation-defined behavior. [
> *Note:* This concatenation is an interpretation, not a conversion.
> Because the interpretation happens in translation phase 6 (after each
> character from a string literal has been translated into a value from the
> appropriate character setafter the string literal contents have been
> encoded in the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s associated
> character encoding), a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s initial rawness
> has no effect on the interpretation or well-formedness of the
> concatenation. — *end note* ] Table 9
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#tab:lex.string.concat> has some
> examples of valid concatenations.
> Table 9 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#tab:lex.string.concat>: String
> literal concatenations [tab:lex.string.concat]
> SourceMeans
> u"a" u"b"
> u"a" "b"
> "a" u"b"
> u"ab"
> u"ab"
> u"ab"
> SourceMeans
> U"a" U"b"
> U"a" "b"
> "a" U"b"
> U"ab"
> U"ab"
> U"ab"
> SourceMeans
> L"a" L"b"
> L"a" "b"
> "a" L"b"
> L"ab"
> L"ab"
> L"ab"
> Characters in concatenated strings are kept distinct.
>
> [ *Example:*
>
> "\xA" "B"
>
> contains the two characters '\xA' and 'B' after concatenation (and not
> the single hexadecimal character '\xAB'). — *end example* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 13
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#13>:
>
> After any necessary concatenation, in translation phase 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>, '\0'a null character is appended to
> every string literal so that programs that scan a string can find its end.
>
> Delete 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 14
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#14>:
> *Drafting note:* This wording has been removed as misleading, incomplete,
> or redundant. String literal contents do not always have the same meaning
> as in character literals. The wording regarding single and double quotes is
> redundant with the grammar. The discussion of string length is unnecessary
> as string length is determined by encoding.
>
> Escape sequences and universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s in
> non-raw string literals have the same meaning as in character literals
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>, except that the single quote ' is
> representable either by itself or by the escape sequence \', and the
> double quote " shall be preceded by a \, and except that a
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> in a
> UTF-16 string literal may yield a surrogate pair. In a narrow string
> literal, a universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> may map
> to more than one char or char8_t element due to multibyte encoding
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#def:encoding,multibyte>. The size of a
> char32_t or wide string literal is the total number of escape sequences,
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s, and
> other characters, plus one for the terminating U'\0' or L'\0'. The size
> of a UTF-16 string literal is the total number of escape sequences,
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s, and
> other characters, plus one for each character requiring a surrogate pair,
> plus one for the terminating u'\0'. [ *Note:* The size of a char16_t
> string literal is the number of code units, not the number of characters. — *end
> note* ] Within char32_t and char16_t string literals, any
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s shall
> be within the range 0x0 to 0x10FFFF. The size of a narrow string literal
> is the total number of escape sequences and other characters, plus at least
> one for the multibyte encoding of each universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>, plus
> one for the terminating '\0'.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 15
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#15>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording for string literal object initialization has
> been moved to a new paragraph.
>
> Evaluating a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> results in a string
> literal object with static storage duration ([basic.stc]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc>), initialized from the given
> characters as specified above. Whether all string literals are distinct
> (that is, are stored in nonoverlapping objects) and whether successive
> evaluations of a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> yield the same or a
> different object is unspecified. [ *Note:* The effect of attempting to
> modify a string literal is undefined. — *end note* ]
>
> Add a new paragraph (X) after 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 15
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#15>:
>
> String literal objects are initialized with a sequence of code unit values
> corresponding to the sequence of s-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>s (for a non-raw string
> literal) and r-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>s (for a
> raw string literal) in the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>. The characters
> denoted by each basic-s-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:basic-s-char>, r-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>, simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> ([lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>), and universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> (
> [lex.charset] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) are encoded to a code
> unit sequence using the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s associated
> encoding. If a character lacks representation in the associated encoding,
> then:
> (X.1) — for an ordinary string literal, an implementation-defined
> character other than the null character is substituted.
> (X.2) — for a wide string literal, an implementation-defined character
> other than the null wide character is substituted.
> (X.3) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 string literal, the literal is
> ill-formed. Each numeric-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:numeric-escape-sequence> ([lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>) contributes a single code unit value
> with the numeric value of the octal or hexadecimal number. There is no
> limit to the number of digits in a hexadecimal sequence. A sequence of
> octal or hexadecimal digits is terminated by the first character that is
> not an octal digit or a hexadecimal digit, respectively. If the numeric
> value exceeds the range of the code unit type, then:
> (X.4) — for an ordinary string literal, an implementation-defined value
> is substituted.
> (X.5) — for a wide string literal, an implementation-defined value is
> substituted.
> (X.6) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 string literal, the literal is
> ill-formed.
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
however I also believe that there isn't quite the right term in the
standard to describe the encoding used at compile time for the values of
members of the execution character set. In [lex.charset] the standard
defers to 'locale' for that:
http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#3.sentence-5
"The values of the members of the execution character sets and the sets of
additional members are locale-specific.
<http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#3.sentence-5> "
See P1859R0 <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P1859R0.html> for early draft
on terminology for execution character set encoding.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:19 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> On 1/8/20 2:48 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused.
> >
> > There is
> >
> > On 08/01/2020 07.53, Tom Honermann via Core wrote:
> >> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 3:
> > but no red/green-marked changes follow for that paragraph.
> > (This appears a few times.)
>
> Thanks, Jens. There are no intended changes to those paragraphs, but I
> forgot to update their introduction to make that clear. I retained
> these paragraphs for ease of review given how pervasive the proposed
> changes are to [lex.ccon] and [lex.string]. I've attached an updated
> draft that states that no changes are made to those paragraphs and to
> highlight them with a blue background. I hope that is helpful.
>
> Tom.
>
> >
> > Jens
>
>
> Document Number: DXXXXR0 *Draft*
> Date: 2020-01-08
> Audience: CWG
> Reply-to: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> Proposed resolution for core
> issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in
> character and string literals
>
> This paper proposes substantial changes to [lex.phases]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>, [lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>, and [lex.string]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string> intended to address the following
> core issues as well as several other more minor issues.
>
> - Core Issue 411: Use of universal-character-name in character versus
> string literals <http://wg21.link/cwg411>
> - Core Issue 1656: Encoding of numerically-escaped characters
> <http://wg21.link/cwg1656>
> - Core Issue 2333: Escape sequences in UTF-8 character literals
> <http://wg21.link/cwg2333>
>
> This paper follows a prior proposed resolution
> <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21kona2019/CoreWorkingGroup/cwg2333.html> that
> only attempted to address CWG 2333 <http://wg21.link/cwg2333>. That
> proposed resolution was discussed on the core mailing list
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/core/2019/01/5395.php> and at the June 24th,
> 2019 core issues processing teleconference
> <http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21cologne2019/CoreIssuesProcessingTeleconference2019-06-24>.
> The resolution proposed in this paper attempts to address the feedback
> provided during those discussions.
>
> The notes for CWG 2333 <http://wg21.link/cwg2333> in the current active
> issues list (revision 100) state that discussion at the August 14th, 2017
> core issues processing teleconference
> <http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21albuquerque/IssuesTeleconference2017-08-14>
> resulted in a determination that numeric escape sequences in UTF-8
> character literals should be ill-formed. The issue has remained in drafting
> status since then.
>
> SG16 discussed this issue during its October 17th, 2018 teleconference
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#october-17th-2018>. The
> SG16 consensus was for a different resolution than is currently described
> in the active issues list. The SG16 consensus was based on the following
> observations:
>
> - The current resolution in the active issues list contradicts
> existing practice. gcc, Clang, and Visual C++ all allow octal and
> hexadecimal escape sequences in UTF-8 literals.
> - Octal and hexadecimal escape sequences in UTF-8 literals are useful
> for a number of purposes:
> - Embedding null characters: u8"\0"
> - Creating ill-formed code unit sequences for testing purposes.
> - Creating Modified UTF-8, CESU-8, and WTF-8 string literals. This
> entails two abilities:
> - Embedding U+0000 as an overlong UTF-8 sequence: u8"\xC0\x80"
> - Embedding lone surrogate code points as individual UTF-8 code
> unit sequences. For example, encoding U+D800 as u8"\xED\xA0\x80".
> (Note that use of \u escapes specifying surrogate code points is
> ill-formed).
> - Compatibility with existing log/debug systems that output
> literals with non-printable characters represented with escapes so as to
> facilitate copy/paste of such output into code.
>
> SG16 conducted the following poll:
> Continue to allow hex and octal escapes that indicate code unit values,
> requiring only that they fit into the range of the code unit type?
> SF F N A SA
> 8 1 0 0 0
> In the polled question, "Continue" refers to existing implementation
> behavior; to maintain the current implementation status quo exhibited by
> gcc, Clang and Visual C++.
>
> The proposed resolution reflects the SG16 consensus.
>
> CWG 411 <http://wg21.link/cwg411> is addressed by specifying different
> behavior for character literals vs string literals for characters that are
> not representable by a single code unit. For example, when the execution
> character set is UTF-8, '\u0153' is conditionally-supported, has type int
> and an implementation-defined value, but "\u0153" is a character array of
> length 3 containing the UTF-8 encoding of U+0153 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE)
> and a null character (\xC5\x93\x00).
>
> CWG 1656 <http://wg21.link/cwg1656> is addressed by clarifying that
> numeric escape sequences denote code unit values in the execution character
> set; that the values are not subject to conversion from the encoding of the
> source file to the execution character set.
> Proposed resolution overview
>
> The proposed wording changes are intended to resolve CWG 411
> <http://wg21.link/cwg411>, CWG 1656 <http://wg21.link/cwg1656>, and CWG
> 2333 <http://wg21.link/cwg2333> by:
>
> - Clarifying that hexadecimal and octal escape sequences:
> - are valid in u8, u, and U character literals. (CWG 2333)
> - specify values that need not correspond to valid code unit values
> for the applicable character encoding. (CWG 2333)
> - specify the execution-time value of character literals or
> individual code unit values of string literals; that the value expressed is
> not subject to conversion to the applicable execution character set. (CWG
> 1656)
> - specify values that may result in string literals that are
> ill-formed according to their applicable character encoding (CWG 2333).
> - Clarifying that characters that cannot be specified in a character
> literal because they require more than one code unit in the applicable
> character encoding may be specified in string literals. (CWG 411)
>
> The concept of an "associated encoding" is introduced for character and
> string literals so as to enable wording to be independent of the particular
> kind of literal (ordinary, wide or Unicode).
>
> New basic-c-char, basic-s-char, and numeric-escape-sequence grammar
> productions are proposed in order to simplify wording. The c-char, s-char,
> and escape-sequence grammar productions are updated to define them in
> terms of the new grammar productions.
>
> Additionally, the wording updates are intended to:
>
> - Specify behavior for non-ordinary character and string literals when
> a character lacks representation in the applicable character encoding.
> (Wording was previously missing)
> - Specify behavior for simple-escape-sequences that denote characters
> that lack representation in the applicable character encoding. (Wording was
> previously missing)
> - Remove wording that states that wchar_t is able to represent all
> members of the execution wide-character set as this contradicts wide spread
> existing practice (SG16 has an issue tracking this at
> https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues/9).
> - Modernize the wording with current style preferences and terminology.
>
> Proposed resolution
>
> These changes are relative to N4835
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/n4835.pdf>.
>
> The changes to [lex.ccon] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon> and
> [lex.string] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string> are rather pervasive.
> For ease of review, unchanged paragraphs in these sections are retained in
> the wording below. These paragraphs are introduced with "*No* changes to
> ..." and are highlighted with a blue background.
>
> These changes do not reflect recent editorial changes made in
> https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/2768; merge conflict resolution
> will be required.
> Hide inserted text
> Hide deleted text
>
> Change in 5.2 [lex.phases] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.5>:
> *Drafting Note:* The change of "escape sequence" to "
> simple-escape-sequence" addresses CWG 1656 <http://wg21.link/cwg1656>.
>
> Each basic source character set memberbasic-c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:basic-c-char>, basic-s-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:basic-s-char>, and r-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char> in a character literal or a
> string literal, as well as each escape sequencesimple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> and
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> in a
> character literal or a non-raw string literal, is converted to the corresponding
> member of the execution character setliteral's associated encoding (
> [lex.ccon] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>, [lex.string]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string>);. if there is no corresponding
> member, it is If a character lacks representation in the associated
> encoding, then the character is converted to an implementation-defined
> character or the literal is ill-formed as specified in [lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon> and [lex.string]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string>. 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#footnote-8>
>
> Change in 5.2 [lex.phases] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.7>:
> *Drafting note:* This addition duplicates wording in [lex.string], but
> seems important to include here.
>
> A null character is appended to every string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>. White-space
> characters separating tokens are no longer significant. Each preprocessing
> token is converted into a token ([lex.token]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.token>). The resulting tokens are
> syntactically and semantically analyzed and translated as a translation
> unit. [ *Note:* The process of analyzing and translating the tokens may
> occasionally result in one token being replaced by a sequence of other
> tokens ([temp.names] <http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names>). — *end note* ]
> It is implementation-defined whether the sources for module units and
> header units on which the current translation unit has an interface
> dependency ([module.unit] <http://eel.is/c++draft/module.unit>,
> [module.import] <http://eel.is/c++draft/module.import>) are required to
> be available. [ *Note:* Source files, translation units and translated
> translation units need not necessarily be stored as files, nor need there
> be any one-to-one correspondence between these entities and any external
> representation. The description is conceptual only, and does not specify
> any particular implementation. — *end note* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>:
>
> character-literal: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:character-literal>
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>opt '
> c-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence> '
>
> encoding-prefix: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix> one
> of
> u8 u U L
>
> c-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence>
> c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>
> c-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence>
> c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>
>
> c-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>
> any member of the basic source character set except the single-quote ',
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
> basic-c-char
> escape-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:escape-sequence>
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>
>
> basic-c-char:
> any member of the basic source character set except the single-quote ',
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
>
> escape-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:escape-sequence>
> simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence>
> octal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:octal-escape-sequence>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
> numeric-escape-sequence
>
> simple-escape-sequence:
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> one of
> \' \" \? \\
> \a \b \f \n \r \t \v
>
> numeric-escape-sequence:
> octal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:octal-escape-sequence>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
>
> octal-escape-sequence:
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:octal-escape-sequence>
> \ octal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit>
> \ octal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit> octal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit>
> \ octal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit> octal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit> octal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:octal-digit>
>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence:
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
> \x hexadecimal-digit
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:hexadecimal-digit>
> hexadecimal-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence>
> hexadecimal-digit <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.icon#nt:hexadecimal-digit>
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#1>:
>
> A character literal*character literal* is one or more charactersa
> c-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence>
> enclosed in single quotes, as in 'x''v', optionally preceded by u8, u, U,
> or Lan encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>, as in u8'w', u'x',
> U'y', or L'z', respectively.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 2
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#2>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter literals, characters that
> lack representation in the execution character set, and the value of a
> character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that does not begin with u8, u, U, or L an
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>,
> such as 'v', is an *ordinary character literal*, has type char unless
> otherwise specified to have type int as described below, and has the
> execution character set ([lex.charset]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) as its associated encoding. An
> ordinary character literal that contains a single c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> representable in the
> execution character set has type char, with value equal to the numerical
> value of the encoding of the c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> in the execution character
> set. An ordinary character literal that contains more than one c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> is a *multicharacter literal*.
> A multicharacter literal, or an ordinary character literal containing a
> single c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> not
> representable in the execution character set, is conditionally-supported,
> has type int, and has an implementation-defined value.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 3
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#3>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter UTF-8 literals, characters
> that cannot be represented in a single UTF-8 code unit, and the value of a
> UTF-8 character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that begins with u8, such as u8'w', is a character
> literal of type char8_t, known as a *UTF-8 character literal*, has type
> char8_t, and has UTF-8 as its associated character encoding. The value of
> a UTF-8 character literal is equal to its ISO/IEC 10646 code point value,
> provided that the code point value can be encoded as a single UTF-8 code
> unit. [ *Note:* That is, provided the code point value is in the range
> 0x0-0x7F (inclusive). — *end note* ] If the value is not representable
> with a single UTF-8 code unit, the program is ill-formed. A UTF-8 character
> literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is ill-formed.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 4
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#4>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter UTF-16 literals, characters
> that cannot be represented in a single UTF-16 code unit, and the value of a
> UTF-16 character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that begins with the letter u, such as u'x', is a character
> literal of type char16_t, known as a *UTF-16 character literal*, has type
> char16_t, and has UTF-16 as its associated character encoding. The value
> of a UTF-16 character literal is equal to its ISO/IEC 10646 code point
> value, provided that the code point value is representable with a single
> 16-bit code unit. [ *Note:* That is, provided the code point value is in
> the range 0x0-0xFFFF (inclusive). — *end note* ] If the value is not
> representable with a single 16-bit code unit, the program is ill-formed. A
> UTF-16 character literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is ill-formed.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#5>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter UTF-32 literals, and the
> value of a UTF-32 character literal has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A character literal that begins with the letter U, such as U'y', is a character
> literal of type char32_t, known as a *UTF-32 character literal*, has type
> char32_t, and has UTF-32 as its associated character encoding. The value
> of a UTF-32 character literal containing a single c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> is equal to its ISO/IEC 10646
> code point value. A UTF-32 character literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is ill-formed.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 6
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#6>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for multicharacter wide literals, and the value
> of a wide character literal has been moved to new paragraphs. The note
> regarding the ability for wchar_t to store all values of the execution
> wide-character set is intentionally removed as it conflicts with long
> standing existing practice (https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues/9).
>
>
> A character literal that begins with the letter L, such as L'z', is a *wide-character
> literal*, has type wchar_t18 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-18>,
> and has the execution wide-character set ([lex.charset]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) as its associated character encoding
> . A wide-character literal has type wchar_t.18
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-18> The value of a
> wide-character literal containing a single c-char has value equal to the
> numerical value of the encoding of the c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> in the execution
> wide-character set, unless the c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> has no representation in the
> execution wide-character set, in which case the value is
> implementation-defined. [ *Note:* The type wchar_t is able to represent
> all members of the execution wide-character set (see [basic.fundamental]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.fundamental>). — *end note* ] The value of
> a wide-character literal containing multiple c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>s is implementation-defined.
>
> Add a new paragraph after 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 6
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#6>:
>
> A character literal with a c-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char-sequence> containing more than
> one c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char>, as in 'abcd', is
> a *multicharacter literal*. An ordinary character literal that is a
> multicharacter literal is conditionally supported, has type int, and has
> an implementation-defined value. A wide-character literal that is a
> multicharacter literal has an implementation-defined value. A UTF-8
> character literal, UTF-16 character literal, or UTF-32 character literal
> that is a multicharacter literal is ill-formed.
>
> Add another new paragraph (X):
>
> The value of a character literal consisting of a single basic-c-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:basic-c-char>, simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence>, or
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is the
> code point value of the specified character encoded according to the
> character literal's associated encoding. If the character lacks
> representation in the associated encoding, then:
> (X.1) — for an ordinary character literal, the literal is conditionally
> supported, has type int, and has an implementation-defined value that is
> not the null character value.
> (X.2) — for a wide-character literal, the literal has an
> implementation-defined value that is not the null wide character value.
> (X.3) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 character literal, the literal is
> ill-formed. If the character requires multiple code units to be encoded
> in the associated encoding, then:
> (X.4) — for an ordinary character literal, the literal is conditionally
> supported, has type int, and has an implementation-defined value that is
> not the null character value.
> (X.5) — for a wide-character literal, the literal has an
> implementation-defined value that is not the null wide character value.
> (X.6) — for a UTF-8 or UTF-16 character literal, the literal is
> ill-formed. *[ Note:* UTF-32 never requires multiple code units for an
> encoded character. *— end note ]*
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#7>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording for additional conditionally-supported simple
> escape sequences has been moved to a new paragraph.
>
> The character specified by a simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> is specified
> in table 8 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc>. *[ Note:*
> The execution character sets do not require representation for the new-line
> (NL), horizontal tab (HT), vertical tab (VT), or form feed (FF)
> characters ([lex.charset] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>); the
> UTF-8, UTF-16, and UTF-32 encodings are able to represent all of the
> simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> characters
> using a single code unit. *— end note ]* Certain non-graphic characters,
> the single quote ', the double quote ", the question mark ?,19
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-19> and the backslash \, can be
> represented according to Table 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc>. The double quote "
> and the question mark ?, can be represented as themselves or by the
> escape sequences \" and \? respectively, but the single quote ' and the
> backslash \ shall be represented by the escape sequences \' and \\
> respectively. Escape sequences in which the character following the
> backslash is not listed in Table 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc> are
> conditionally-supported, with implementation-defined semantics. An escape
> sequence specifies a single character.
>
> Table 8 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc>: ESimple escape
> sequences [tab:lex.ccon.esc]
> new-line NL(LF) \n
> horizontal tab HT \t
> vertical tab VT \v
> backspace BS \b
> carriage return CR \r
> form feed FF \f
> alert BEL \a
> backslash \ \\
> question mark 19 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#footnote-19> ? \?
> single quote ' \'
> double quote " \"
> octal number ooo \ooo
> hex number hhh \xhhh
>
> Add a new paragraph after 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#7>:
>
> Additional simple escape sequences in which the character following the
> backslash is not listed in Table 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#tab:lex.ccon.esc> are
> conditionally-supported, with implementation-defined semantics.
>
> Change in 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#8>:
> *Drafting Note:* Wording describing the form of octal and hexadecimal
> escape sequences has been removed as redundant; the form is implicit in the
> grammar.
>
> The value of a character literal consisting of a single
> numeric-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:numeric-escape-sequence> is the
> numeric value of the octal or hexadecimal number. The escape \ooo
> consists of the backslash followed by one, two, or three octal digits that
> are taken to specify the value of the desired character. The escape \xhhh
> consists of the backslash followed by x followed by one or more
> hexadecimal digits that are taken to specify the value of the desired
> character. There is no limit to the number of digits in a hexadecimal
> sequence. A sequence of octal or hexadecimal digits is terminated by the
> first character that is not an octal digit or a hexadecimal digit,
> respectively. The value of a character literal is implementation-defined
> if it falls outside of the implementation-defined range defined for char
> (for character literals with no prefix) or wchar_t (for character
> literals prefixed by L). *[ Note:* If the value of a character literal
> prefixed by u, u8, or U is outside the range defined for its type, the
> program is ill-formed. *— end note ]*If the numeric value exceeds the
> range of the character literal type, then:
> (8.1) — for an ordinary character literal, the value is
> implementation-defined.
> (8.2) — for a wide character literal, the value is implementation-defined.
> (8.3) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 character literal, the literal is
> ill-formed.
>
> Delete 5.13.3 [lex.ccon] paragraph 9 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#9>:
> *Drafting Note:* The normative text was combined with wording for
> basic-c-char and simple-escape-sequence above. The deleted note
> duplicates normative text in 5.2 [lex.phases] paragraph 1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.1>.
>
> A universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is
> translated to the encoding, in the appropriate execution character set, of
> the character named. If there is no such encoding, the
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is
> translated to an implementation-defined encoding. [ *Note:* In
> translation phase 1, a universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> is
> introduced whenever an actual extended character is encountered in the
> source text. Therefore, all extended characters are described in terms of
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s
> However, the actual compiler implementation may use its own native
> character set, so long as the same results are obtained. — *end note* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string>:
>
> string-literal: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>opt "
> s-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence>opt
> "
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>opt R
> raw-string <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>
>
> s-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence>
> s-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>
> s-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence>
> s-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>
>
> s-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>
> any member of the basic source character set except the double-quote ",
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
> basic-s-char
> escape-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:escape-sequence>
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>
>
> basic-s-char:
> any member of the basic source character set except the double-quote ",
> backslash \, or new-line <http://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.pre#nt:new-line>
> character
>
> raw-string: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>
> " d-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> opt ( r-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char-sequence>opt )
> d-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>opt
> "
>
> r-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char-sequence>
> r-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>
> r-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char-sequence>
> r-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>
>
> r-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>
> any member of the source character set, except a right parenthesis )
> followed by
> the initial d-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence> (which may be
> empty) followed by a double quote ".
>
> d-char-sequence: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> d-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char>
> d-char-sequence <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> d-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char>
>
> d-char: <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char>
> any member of the source character set except:
> space, the left parenthesis (, the right parenthesis ), the backslash \,
> and the control characters
> representing horizontal tab, vertical tab, form feed, and newline.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#1>:
>
> A *string-literal* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> is
> a sequence of characters (as defined in [lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>) surrounded by double quotes,
> optionally prefixed by R, u8, u8R, u, uR, U, UR, L, or LR, as in "...",
> R"(...)", u8"...", u8R"**(...)**", u"...", uR"*~(...)*~", U"...",
> UR"zzz(...)zzz", L"...", or LR"(...)", respectively.is one of the
> following optionally preceded by an encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>:
> (1.1) — an optional s-char-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char-sequence> enclosed in double
> quotes as in "", "abc", u8"def", u"ghi", U"jkl", or L"mno".
> (1.2) — a raw-string <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>
> preceded by R as in R"()", R"(ABC)", u8R"**(DEF)**", uR"*~(GHI)*~",
> UR"zzz(JKL)zzz", or LR"(MNO)".
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 2
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#2>:
>
> A *string-literal* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that has an R in the prefix is a *raw string literal*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#def:raw_string_literal>. The
> *d-char-sequence* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> serves as a delimiter. The terminating *d-char-sequence*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence> of a *raw-string*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string> is the same sequence of
> characters as the initial *d-char-sequence*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>. A
> *d-char-sequence* <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:d-char-sequence>
> shall consist of at most 16 characters.
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 3
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#3>:
>
> [ *Note:* The characters '(' and ')' are permitted in a *raw-string*
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:raw-string>. Thus,
> R"delimiter((a|b))delimiter" is equivalent to "(a|b)". — *end note* ]
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 4
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#4>:
>
> [ *Note:* A source-file new-line in a raw string literal results in a
> new-line in the resulting execution string literal. Assuming no whitespace
> at the beginning of lines in the following example, the assert will
> succeed:
>
> const char* p = R"(a\
> b
> c)";
> assert(std::strcmp(p, "a\\\nb\nc") == 0);
>
> — *end note* ]
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#5>:
>
> [ *Example:* The raw string
>
> R"a(
> )\
> a"
> )a"
>
> is equivalent to "\n)\\\na\"\n". The raw string
>
> R"(x = "\"y\"")"
>
> is equivalent to "x = \"\\\"y\\\"\"". — *end example* ]
>
> Add a new paragraph after 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 5
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#5>:
>
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>s
> have type "array of *n* const *CHAR_T*" where *CHAR_T* is the
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s
> associated code unit type, and *n* is the number of code units required
> to represent the contents of the string after translation phase 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.7> ([lex.phases]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>) in the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s associated
> encoding.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 6
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#6>:
> *Drafting note:* The wording regarding translation phase 6 has been
> removed as inaccurate; string contents are not fully known until after
> phase 7. Wording regarding the translation phase dependency and the
> literal's type has been moved to the new paragraph above. Wording for
> storage duration and string literal initialization has been moved to a new
> paragraph.
>
> After translation phase 6, aA string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> that does not begin
> with an encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix> is an *ordinary
> string literal*, has type char as its associated code unit type, and has
> the execution character set ([lex.charset]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) as its associated character encoding
> . An ordinary string literal has type "array of *n* const char" where *n*
> is the size of the string as defined below, has static storage duration (
> [basic.stc] <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc>), and is initialized with
> the given characters.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#7>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with u8, such as u8"asdf", is a *UTF-8 string literal*, has
> type char8_t as its associated code unit type, and has UTF-8 as its
> associated character encoding. A UTF-8 string literal has type "array of
> *n* const char8_t", where *n* is the size of the string as defined below;
> each successive element of the object representation ([basic.types]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.types>) has the value of the corresponding
> code unit of the UTF-8 encoding of the string.
>
> *No* changes to 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 8
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#8>:
>
> Ordinary string literals and UTF-8 string literals are also referred to as
> narrow string literals.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 9
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#9>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs. The note has been deleted as redundant;
> the use of surrogate pairs is explicit in the UTF-16 encoding.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with u, such as u"asdf", is a *UTF-16 string literal*, has
> type char16_t as its associated code unit type, and has UTF-16 as its
> associated character encoding. A UTF-16 string literal has type "array of
> *n* const char16_t", where *n* is the size of the string as defined
> below; each successive element of the array has the value of the
> corresponding code unit of the UTF-16 encoding of the string. [ *Note:* A
> single c-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:c-char> may produce
> more than one char16_t character in the form of surrogate pairs. A
> surrogate pair is a representation for a single code point as a sequence of
> two 16-bit code units. — *end note* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 10
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#10>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with U, such as U"asdf", is a *UTF-32 string literal*, has
> type char32_t as its associated code unit type, and has UTF-32 as its
> associated character encoding. A UTF-32 string literal has type "array of
> *n* const char32_t", where *n* is the size of the string as defined
> below; each successive element of the array has the value of the
> corresponding code unit of the UTF-32 encoding of the string.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 11
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#11>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording regarding the literal's type and initialization
> has been moved to new paragraphs.
>
> A string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>
> that begins with L, such as L"asdf", is a *wide string literal*, has type
> wchar_t as its associated code unit type, and has the execution
> wide-character set ([lex.charset] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>)
> as its associated character encoding. A wide string literal has type
> "array of *n* const wchar_t", where *n* is the size of the string as
> defined below; it is initialized with the given characters.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 12
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#12>:
>
> In translation phase 6 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>, adjacent
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>s are
> concatenated. If both string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>s have the same
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>, the
> resulting concatenated string literal has that encoding-prefix
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>. If one
> string-literal <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> has
> no encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix>,
> it is treated as a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> of the same
> encoding-prefix <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:encoding-prefix> as
> the other operand. If a UTF-8 string literal token is adjacent to a wide
> string literal token, the program is ill-formed. Any other concatenations
> are conditionally-supported with implementation-defined behavior. [
> *Note:* This concatenation is an interpretation, not a conversion.
> Because the interpretation happens in translation phase 6 (after each
> character from a string literal has been translated into a value from the
> appropriate character setafter the string literal contents have been
> encoded in the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s associated
> character encoding), a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s initial rawness
> has no effect on the interpretation or well-formedness of the
> concatenation. — *end note* ] Table 9
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#tab:lex.string.concat> has some
> examples of valid concatenations.
> Table 9 <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#tab:lex.string.concat>: String
> literal concatenations [tab:lex.string.concat]
> SourceMeans
> u"a" u"b"
> u"a" "b"
> "a" u"b"
> u"ab"
> u"ab"
> u"ab"
> SourceMeans
> U"a" U"b"
> U"a" "b"
> "a" U"b"
> U"ab"
> U"ab"
> U"ab"
> SourceMeans
> L"a" L"b"
> L"a" "b"
> "a" L"b"
> L"ab"
> L"ab"
> L"ab"
> Characters in concatenated strings are kept distinct.
>
> [ *Example:*
>
> "\xA" "B"
>
> contains the two characters '\xA' and 'B' after concatenation (and not
> the single hexadecimal character '\xAB'). — *end example* ]
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 13
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#13>:
>
> After any necessary concatenation, in translation phase 7
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases>, '\0'a null character is appended to
> every string literal so that programs that scan a string can find its end.
>
> Delete 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 14
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#14>:
> *Drafting note:* This wording has been removed as misleading, incomplete,
> or redundant. String literal contents do not always have the same meaning
> as in character literals. The wording regarding single and double quotes is
> redundant with the grammar. The discussion of string length is unnecessary
> as string length is determined by encoding.
>
> Escape sequences and universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s in
> non-raw string literals have the same meaning as in character literals
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>, except that the single quote ' is
> representable either by itself or by the escape sequence \', and the
> double quote " shall be preceded by a \, and except that a
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> in a
> UTF-16 string literal may yield a surrogate pair. In a narrow string
> literal, a universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> may map
> to more than one char or char8_t element due to multibyte encoding
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#def:encoding,multibyte>. The size of a
> char32_t or wide string literal is the total number of escape sequences,
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s, and
> other characters, plus one for the terminating U'\0' or L'\0'. The size
> of a UTF-16 string literal is the total number of escape sequences,
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s, and
> other characters, plus one for each character requiring a surrogate pair,
> plus one for the terminating u'\0'. [ *Note:* The size of a char16_t
> string literal is the number of code units, not the number of characters. — *end
> note* ] Within char32_t and char16_t string literals, any
> universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>s shall
> be within the range 0x0 to 0x10FFFF. The size of a narrow string literal
> is the total number of escape sequences and other characters, plus at least
> one for the multibyte encoding of each universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name>, plus
> one for the terminating '\0'.
>
> Change in 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 15
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#15>:
> *Drafting note:* Wording for string literal object initialization has
> been moved to a new paragraph.
>
> Evaluating a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> results in a string
> literal object with static storage duration ([basic.stc]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc>), initialized from the given
> characters as specified above. Whether all string literals are distinct
> (that is, are stored in nonoverlapping objects) and whether successive
> evaluations of a string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal> yield the same or a
> different object is unspecified. [ *Note:* The effect of attempting to
> modify a string literal is undefined. — *end note* ]
>
> Add a new paragraph (X) after 5.13.5 [lex.string] paragraph 15
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#15>:
>
> String literal objects are initialized with a sequence of code unit values
> corresponding to the sequence of s-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:s-char>s (for a non-raw string
> literal) and r-char <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>s (for a
> raw string literal) in the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>. The characters
> denoted by each basic-s-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:basic-s-char>, r-char
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:r-char>, simple-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:simple-escape-sequence> ([lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>), and universal-character-name
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset#nt:universal-character-name> (
> [lex.charset] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.charset>) are encoded to a code
> unit sequence using the string-literal
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#nt:string-literal>'s associated
> encoding. If a character lacks representation in the associated encoding,
> then:
> (X.1) — for an ordinary string literal, an implementation-defined
> character other than the null character is substituted.
> (X.2) — for a wide string literal, an implementation-defined character
> other than the null wide character is substituted.
> (X.3) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 string literal, the literal is
> ill-formed. Each numeric-escape-sequence
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:numeric-escape-sequence> ([lex.ccon]
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon>) contributes a single code unit value
> with the numeric value of the octal or hexadecimal number. There is no
> limit to the number of digits in a hexadecimal sequence. A sequence of
> octal or hexadecimal digits is terminated by the first character that is
> not an octal digit or a hexadecimal digit, respectively. If the numeric
> value exceeds the range of the code unit type, then:
> (X.4) — for an ordinary string literal, an implementation-defined value
> is substituted.
> (X.5) — for a wide string literal, an implementation-defined value is
> substituted.
> (X.6) — for a UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32 string literal, the literal is
> ill-formed.
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
Received on 2020-01-08 14:20:06