Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:50:06 +0300
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:55 AM Thiago Macieira <thiago_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> At the risk of just kicking the can down the road, isn't there something the
> Unicode Consortium should provide?
It provides East Asian Width. It's unfortunate that despite emoji
arising from the domain of East Asian typography, East Asian Width
doesn't work well for later emoji additions. But defining some kind of
Extended East Asian Width would indeed be something one would expect
the Unicode Consortium to define instead of something that the C++
committee should define.
> At the risk of just kicking the can down the road, isn't there something the
> Unicode Consortium should provide?
It provides East Asian Width. It's unfortunate that despite emoji
arising from the domain of East Asian typography, East Asian Width
doesn't work well for later emoji additions. But defining some kind of
Extended East Asian Width would indeed be something one would expect
the Unicode Consortium to define instead of something that the C++
committee should define.
-- Henri Sivonen hsivonen_at_[hidden] https://hsivonen.fi/
Received on 2019-09-13 07:50:23