Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:15:00 +0000
> use the posix/c/sc2 model of abstract characters that has been the model in iso for many
> years and is also the model in the internet. no big deal. unicode is just a number of
> harsets , utf8, utf16 utf32 etc.
>
> keld
>
I've looked at POSIX and the only thing I could find is this:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap06.html#tag_06_01
This means zero Unicode support.
As for C, C only has char16_t, char32_t, minimalistic literal support...
I'm not sure about standard library. That's about 2% of Unicode support.
I don't know what is sc2.
So, in total:
POSIX - 0% Unicode.
C - ~2% Unicode.
That's how far "abstract characters" get you.
> years and is also the model in the internet. no big deal. unicode is just a number of
> harsets , utf8, utf16 utf32 etc.
>
> keld
>
I've looked at POSIX and the only thing I could find is this:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap06.html#tag_06_01
This means zero Unicode support.
As for C, C only has char16_t, char32_t, minimalistic literal support...
I'm not sure about standard library. That's about 2% of Unicode support.
I don't know what is sc2.
So, in total:
POSIX - 0% Unicode.
C - ~2% Unicode.
That's how far "abstract characters" get you.
Received on 2019-04-27 15:15:35