Subject: Re: [SG16-Unicode] D1628R0 (Unicode character properties)
From: Lyberta (lyberta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-03-28 11:21:00
> I also, on reflection, think excluding char and wchar is misguided. The
> contract is that char8 etc are utf-8 etc, but it's also frequently the case
> that the execution narrow and wide encodings are also unicode. That you
> have possible GIGO errors isn't a good reason to block possible correct
> use. It just encourages casting.
We could use concepts to check later, Just need to define proper
concepts which I don't have yet in my design. But I'd say using strong
types still feels better.
SG16 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org