Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:22:01 -0400
On 10/09/2018 01:42 AM, Markus Scherer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:59 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:tom_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>> And I doubt that there is any platform that supports C++11 or
>> higher and where uint8_t != uint_least8_t.
> I hope that is true. But there are platforms where uint8_t is not
> available because uint_least8_t is larger than 8 bits.
>
>
> Which ones?
> Do they support C++11?
Compilers I'm aware of (ones that Coverity supports) that target
platforms where bytes are larger than 8 bits (either 16-bit or 32-bit)
include the following.
- Analog VisualDSP++ (targeting SHARC, TigerSHARC)
- CEVA (targeting TeakLite)
- Texas Instruments (targeting C2000, C54x, C55x)
I'm not sure if any of these support C++11 or not. The TI C2000 one at
least is actively maintained.
Tom.
>
> markus
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:59 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:tom_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>> And I doubt that there is any platform that supports C++11 or
>> higher and where uint8_t != uint_least8_t.
> I hope that is true. But there are platforms where uint8_t is not
> available because uint_least8_t is larger than 8 bits.
>
>
> Which ones?
> Do they support C++11?
Compilers I'm aware of (ones that Coverity supports) that target
platforms where bytes are larger than 8 bits (either 16-bit or 32-bit)
include the following.
- Analog VisualDSP++ (targeting SHARC, TigerSHARC)
- CEVA (targeting TeakLite)
- Texas Instruments (targeting C2000, C54x, C55x)
I'm not sure if any of these support C++11 or not. The TI C2000 one at
least is actively maintained.
Tom.
>
> markus
Received on 2018-10-09 19:22:05