C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16-Unicode] Draft SG16 direction paper

From: Artyom Tokmakov <artyom.tokmakov_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 20:03:06 -0700
On October 8, 2018 19:45:35 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It would be interesting to get more perspective on how and why ICU evolved
> like it did. What was the motivation for ICU to switch to char16_t? Were
> the anticipated benefits realized despite the perhaps unanticipated
> complexities?

I believe it was mentioned during the last meeting that this was
specifically to support u"..." string literals. I could be wrong though.

Received on 2018-10-09 05:03:11