C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: [SG16-Unicode] Feedback on P1097R1: U+NNNNNN syntax

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:31:31 -0400
On 07/06/2018 05:16 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
> I am wondering if accepting U+(4-6 hex digits) in \N{...} as Perl does
> can be considered.

It certainly can be, but what is the motivation given that we already
have \u and \U? Why is supporting both \u1234 and \N{U+1234} helpful?

Tom.

Received on 2018-07-06 23:31:39