Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:46:00 +0200
On 19.06.18 14:45, Martinho Fernandes wrote:
> Ah, so if I initialize code_point_sequence from a string literal, then
> code_unit_sequence will be deduced implicitly as the underlying type for
> code_unit_sequence?
Correction: "as the underlying type for code_point_sequence"
> Ah, so if I initialize code_point_sequence from a string literal, then
> code_unit_sequence will be deduced implicitly as the underlying type for
> code_unit_sequence?
Correction: "as the underlying type for code_point_sequence"
-- Martinho
Received on 2018-06-19 14:47:24