Em sex., 3 de jun. de 2022 às 13:55, Daniela Engert via SG15
<sg15@lists.isocpp.org> escreveu:
> On a tangent, what I really miss is metadata (possibly living besides the
> BMI) which is telling the compiler and build tools which header files a
> (named) module is replacing such that #include <lib/some/header.hpp>
> would be automatically translated into import lib;
That is interesting, but I don't know if the standard allows that. The
only thing the standard predicts is replacing `#include <foo.h>` by
`import <foo.h>`.
There's a lot of freedom in how headers and source files are found and what their contents are. Nothing stops a conforming implementation from saying "I found <lib/some/header.hpp> in *waves hands around generally* and its contents are `import <foo.h>;`".