Roger.
(This is a comment about words, not an answer to "Is this change right?")
The resolution attached to the core page suggests the possibility that a type might be an object:
the type of the original object is neither a complete object that is const-qualified nor a subobject of such an object[...]
As the type of the original object is no longer at issue, I suggest:
the original object is neither a complete object of const-qualified type, nor a subobject of such an object[...]
(About the meaning)
Mutable becomes a little weirder.
On Nov 6, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Hubert Tong via Core <core@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Core is ready for SG12 to review and make a recommendation to EWG.
-- HT
On 06/11/2019 15.49, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:25, Hubert Tong
> <hubert.reinterpretcast@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's a transcription error in the notes. The notes should say:
>> "the original object is neither a complete object that is const-qualified nor a subobject of such an object"
>
> Herr Maurer, können Sie bitte schön die Notizen reparieren?
Ich habe die Notizen repariert. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
(Fixed.)
Thanks,
Jens
_______________________________________________
Core mailing list
Core@lists.isocpp.org
Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/core
Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2019/11/7588.php