On 18 October 2013 19:41, Nevin Liber <nevin@eviloverlord.com> wrote:
On 18 October 2013 11:26, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com> wrote:

Would anyone like to summarize the EWG issue people desire to raise? Just
making the optional int types non-optional? Something further than that as well?
Nailing down CHAR_BIT? Anything else?

Well, if we are going to start nailing things down, I'm all for totally ordering pointers with respect to operator<. 


I'm all for people finding out how to submit non-paper issues to the EWG scribe and
then performing the actual submission. I'm much less for people assuming that the scribe
will automatically create issues from chaotic email discussions. :D