Thanks, everyone! So I will proceed as follows:
- __cpp_lib_format will be bumped, and is to refer only to P2419R2 ("Clarify handling of encodings in localized formatting of chrono types") and P2508R1 ("Expose std::basic-format-string<charT, Args...>").
- A new macro __cpp_lib_format_ranges will be added to refer to P2286R8 ("Formatting Ranges") and P2585R1 ("Improve container default formatting"), and those papers will NOT be tracked by __cpp_lib_format anymore (as a material change to the approved content).Is that acceptable?The change will be applied after all the motions.Thank you!ThomasOn Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 23:42, Casey Carter via Lib <email@example.com> wrote:Related: P1224R4 flat_set is missing a feature-test macro. Could we add __cpp_lib_flat_set for it?_______________________________________________On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 6:29 PM Casey Carter <Casey@carter.net> wrote:On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:59 PM Victor Zverovich <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Adding __cpp_lib_format_ranges for P2286 and P2585 sounds like a good idea.P2508 and P2419 are minor (from the implementation perspective) changes so I think just bumping the __cpp_lib_format macro is fine.For the record, I'm willing to accept Victor's expert assertion that these are both small enough that there's no reason to support separate implementation and that a single macro bump is good.
Lib mailing list
Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/07/23266.php