Thanks, everyone! So I will proceed as follows:

Is that acceptable?

The change will be applied after all the motions.

Thank you!

Thomas

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 23:42, Casey Carter via Lib <lib@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Related: P1224R4 flat_set is missing a feature-test macro. Could we add __cpp_lib_flat_set for it?

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 6:29 PM Casey Carter <Casey@carter.net> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:59 PM Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich@gmail.com> wrote:
Adding __cpp_lib_format_ranges for P2286 and P2585 sounds like a good idea.

P2508 and P2419 are minor (from the implementation perspective) changes so I think just bumping the __cpp_lib_format macro is fine.

For the record, I'm willing to accept Victor's expert assertion that these are both small enough that there's no reason to support separate implementation and that a single macro bump is good.
_______________________________________________
Lib mailing list
Lib@lists.isocpp.org
Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/07/23266.php